A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

In Vitro Biomechanics of Human Cadaveric Cervical Spines With Mature Fusion. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compared the biomechanics of cadaveric spines with mature fusions to normal spines in both intact and acutely fixed conditions.
  • Findings showed that mature fusion spines had significantly higher bone mineral density and less range of motion (ROM) compared to freshly fixed spines across various movements.
  • Additionally, adjacent levels in mature fusion spines displayed reduced mobility, particularly the levels immediately next to the fusion site, indicating potential impacts on overall spinal flexibility.

Article Abstract

Background: This study sought to compare index and adjacent-level biomechanics of cadaveric specimens with mature fusion versus normal spines in intact and acutely fused conditions.

Methods: Eight human cadaveric cervical spines with mature fusion across 1 to 3 levels were studied. Intervertebral angular range of motion (ROM) was determined at fused and adjacent levels during pure moments inducing flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). Mature fusion data were compared to data from normal spine specimens tested intact and then with a 1-level anterior plate/graft (fresh fixation). Bone qualities were compared using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Results: Mean bone mineral density was significantly greater in mature fusion spines (0.632 ± 0.239 g/cm) than in normal spines (0.489 ± 0.195 g/cm) ( < .001). Mean ROM for levels with mature fusion was 42% (FE), 42% (LB), and 29% (AR) of the mean same-level ROM in freshly fixated specimens ( .045). The mean adjacent-level ROM in spines with mature fusion was less than in normal spines (matched levels) in all directions, with the greatest difference 1 level below fusion (FE: -38%, < .001; LB: -42%, < .001; AR: -49%, .001), followed by 1 level above fusion (FE: -23%, .04; LB: -22%, .07; AR: -28%, .02) and 2 levels above fusion (FE: -20%, .08; LB: -18%, .11; AR: -31%, .009). Mature fusion reduced the magnitude of coupled LB during AR at C6-7 and C7-T1 ( .03).

Conclusion: Cervical spine segments with mature fusion have higher bone mass, are less flexible than freshly fixed spines, and have reduced mobility at adjacent levels.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8651198PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/8114DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mature fusion
36
spines mature
12
fusion
12
normal spines
12
mature
9
human cadaveric
8
cadaveric cervical
8
spines
8
cervical spines
8
adjacent levels
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!