[Metacognitive deficit in schizophrenia: Characteristics and links].

Objectives: Research indicates that many patients with schizophrenia experience deficits in metacognitive capacity defined as the ability to form complex representations of themselves and others. The aim of the current study was to assess metacognitive deficit in patients with schizophrenia. These variables were collected together with many other sociodemographic, clinical and therapeutic data.

Methods: We conducted a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study in the psychiatry department at the Hedi Chaker University Hospital in Sfax (Tunisia). Patients were in a non-acute phase, defined by the absence of any psychiatric symptoms during the last four weeks, also, no changes in medication during the previous month had been required. An informed written consent was obtained, following which patients completed questionnaires assessing sociodemographic and clinical data during structured interviews. Symptoms and severity of the illness were assessed using the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS). Insight was assessed using the Insight Scale (Q8). In addition, the Metacognition Assessment Scale-Abbreviated (MAS-A) was used to assess metacognitive capacities. The MAS-A contains four dimensions: self-reflectivity, awareness of the mind of others, decentration, and mastery. Higher scores reflect an ability to effectively respond to psychological challenges on the basis of psychological knowledge.

Results: We recruited 74 adults with schizophrenia disorder. The diagnosis was with DSM5. Their average age was 45 years (SD=9.84 years) with a sex ratio (M/F) of 1.552. Nineteen patients (25.5%) were married, and low educational level was present in 43% of cases. Forty patients (54%) were unemployed. Metacognitive deficit was detected in all the patients. They had low levels in all four dimensions of metacognition. The most affected dimension in our series was "Mastery". All patients had an overall insight score less than six (the average score was 2.73) with poor awareness in 62% of patients. The main factors correlated with metacognitive deficit were: occupational inactivity (P-0.015), Primary education level (P=0.045), tobacco consumption (P=0.002), low insight (P-0.001), negative symptomatology (P<10-3) and the use of first generation of antipsychotics (P=0.003). The multivariate analysis showed that three factors (occupational inactivity, low insight and the presence of negative symptomatology) were predictors of metacognitive deficits.

Conclusion: Based on our results, occupational inactivity, negative symptomatology and low insight are predictors of metacognitive deficit in schizophrenia. Specific therapeutics should be proposed to act on these factors. A metacognitive training program, tailored to this vulnerable population, is a priority to improve their quality of life.