Aims: The primary aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of primary total ankle replacements (PTAR) in the UK. Secondary aim was to identify predictors associated with increased cost-effectiveness of PTAR.
Methods: Pre-operative and six-month post-operative data was obtained over a 90-month period across the two centres receiving adult referrals in the UK. The EuroQol general health questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) measured health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) measured joint function. Predictors, tested for significance with QALYs gained, were pre-operative scores and demographic data including age, gender, BMI and socioeconomic status. A cost per QALY of less than £20,000 was defined as cost effective.
Results: The 51-patient cohort [mean age 67.70 (SD 8.91), 58.8% male] had 47.7% classed as obese or higher. Cost per QALY gained was £1669, rising to £4466 when annual (3.5%) reduction in health gains and revision rates and discounting were included. Lower pre-operative EQ-5D-3L index correlated significantly with increased QALYs gained (p < 0.01), all other predictors were not significantly (p > 0.05) associated with QALYs gained.
Conclusions: PTAR is a cost-effective intervention for treating end-stage ankle arthritis. Pre-operative EQ-5D-3L was associated with QALYs gained. A pre-operative EQ-5D-3L score of 0.57 or more was not cost effective to operate on.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2021.101830 | DOI Listing |
Osteoporos Int
December 2024
Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Unlabelled: A cost-effectiveness analysis of FRAX® intervention thresholds (ITs) in Indian women over 50 years indicated that generic alendronate was cost-effective for age-dependent major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) ITs and hip fracture (HF) ITs starting at ages 60 and 65 years for full and real-world adherence, respectively. Alendronate was cost-effective at fixed MOF IT of 14% and HF IT of 3.5%, regardless of age.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDig Dis Sci
December 2024
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Background And Aims: Ulcerative colitis (UC) can be treated with infliximab (IFX). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can yield superior outcomes, but its cost-effectiveness is unknown.
Methods: We used a decision analytic Markov model to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing proactive TDM, reactive TDM, no TDM, and combinations of proactive and reactive TDM in 25-year-old patients with UC started on IFX.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm
December 2024
Health Economics and Value Assessment, Sanofi, Boston, MA.
Background: Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare, life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy. Caplacizumab is the only treatment approved by the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration for iTTP, to be given in combination with plasma exchange therapy (PEX) and immunosuppression (IS). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's independent appraisal committee assessed the cost-effectiveness of caplacizumab and concluded that the addition of caplacizumab to PEX+IS is cost-effective under a patient access scheme in the United Kingdom.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Oncol
December 2024
Department of Oncology, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong, China.
Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of combining camrelizumab with rivoceranib versus sorafenib as initial treatment options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) across different developmental regions in China.
Methods: Utilizing TreeAge Pro and data from the phase III randomized CARES-310 clinical trial, a model based on Markov state transitions was developed. Health state utility values were derived from the CARES-310 trial, and direct medical costs were obtained from relevant literature and local pricing data.
BMC Cancer
December 2024
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 45008, China.
Background: It has been proposed that risk model-based strategies could serve as viable alternatives to traditional risk factor-based approaches in lung cancer screening; however, there has been no systematic discussion. In this review, we provide an overview of the benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of these two strategies in lung cancer screening application, as well as discussing possible future research directions.
Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane libraries, and EMBASE from January 1994 to April 2024.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!