AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigates the effectiveness of anti-TNFα therapy for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), noting that a significant number of patients either don't respond initially or lose their response over time.
  • Researchers aimed to validate the use of polygenetic risk scores as predictors for treatment response but found no significant differences in these scores between different response groups in both CD and UC patients.
  • The conclusion suggests that current evidence does not support the use of polygenetic risk scores for predicting treatment outcomes in patients undergoing anti-TNFα therapy for CD or UC.

Article Abstract

Background: Anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) therapy is widely used in the management of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, up to a third of patients do not respond to induction therapy and another third of patients lose response over time. To aid patient stratification, polygenetic risk scores have been identified as predictors of response to anti-TNFα therapy. We aimed to replicate the association between polygenetic risk scores and response to anti-TNFα therapy in an independent cohort of patients, to establish its clinical validity.

Materials And Methods: Primary non-response, primary response, durable response and loss of response to anti-TNFα therapy was retrospectively assessed for each patient using stringent definitions. Genome wide genotyping was performed and previously described polygenetic risk scores for primary non-response and durable response were calculated. We compared polygenetic risk scores between patients with primary response and primary non-response, and between patients with durable response and loss of response, using separate analyses for CD and UC.

Results: Out of 334 patients with CD, 15 (4%) patients met criteria for primary non-response, 221 (66%) for primary response, 115 (34%) for durable response and 35 (10%) for loss of response. Out of 112 patients with UC, 12 (11%) met criteria for primary non-response, 68 (61%) for primary response, 19 (17%) for durable response and 20 (18%) for loss of response. No significant differences in polygenetic risk scores were found between primary non-responders and primary responders, and between durable responders and loss of responders.

Conclusions: We could not replicate the previously reported association between polygenetic risk scores and response to anti-TNFα therapy in an independent cohort of patients with CD or UC. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to use polygenetic risk scores to predict response to anti-TNFα therapy in patients with IBD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448323PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0256860PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

polygenetic risk
32
risk scores
32
response anti-tnfα
24
anti-tnfα therapy
24
primary non-response
20
durable response
20
response
19
primary response
16
loss response
16
primary
11

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!