Rejoinder: The Future of Reliability.

Psychometrika

Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Published: December 2021

In this rejoinder, we examine some of the issues Peter Bentler, Eunseong Cho, and Jules Ellis raise. We suggest a methodological solid way to construct a test indicating that the importance of the particular reliability method used is minor, and we discuss future topics in reliability research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636397PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09807-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rejoinder future
4
future reliability
4
reliability rejoinder
4
rejoinder examine
4
examine issues
4
issues peter
4
peter bentler
4
bentler eunseong
4
eunseong cho
4
cho jules
4

Similar Publications

The five discussions of our paper provide several modeling alternatives, extensions, and generalizations that can potentially guide future research in meta-analysis. In this rejoinder, we briefly summarize and comment on some of those points.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this paper, we propose a crucial supplement to the framework of plant cognition, namely extend cognition. We argue that plants and other organisms with an open-ended body plan actively extend their cognition when growing tissues or organs. Their cognition expands with their body expansion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This rejoinder refers to the research of Otaiku (J Religion Health 1-17, 2022), which concluded that low religiosity in adulthood is associated with an increased risk of developing Parkinson's disease. Although Otaiku points to a number of limitations of their own research and thus clearly qualifies that further work is needed to verify the findings, a number of concerns still need to be raised about this research. Five points are highlighted in this article, namely (1) it is not clear why and how the variables of religiosity and spirituality were combined; (2) it is not reported whether other variables were tested; (3) they refer to the four different groups of how religiosity plays a role, which include extremely small samples of 11, 16, 25, 22 participants, (4) the final conclusion is based only on the two extreme groups with Parkinson's disease, (5) it remains unclear whether all patients had Parkinson's disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rejoinder to "Instrumented difference-in-differences".

Biometrics

June 2023

Department of Statistics and Data Science, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

We thank all the discussants for the careful reading and insightful comments. In our rejoinder, we extend the discussion of how the assumptions of instrumented difference-in-differences (iDID) compare to the assumptions of the standard instrumental variable method. We also make additional comments on how iDID is related to the fuzzy DID.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We thank the editors for organizing the discussions and the discussants for insightful comments. Our rejoinder provides results and comments to address the questions raised in the discussions. Specifically, we present results showing DICA largely demonstrates better or comparable stability as compared with standard ICA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!