Background Glutathione is a water-soluble tripeptide with a potent oxidant scavenging activity. We hypothesized that glutathione administration immediately before and after primary angioplasty (primary percutaneous coronary intervention) could be effective in modulating immune cell activation, thereby preventing infarct expansion. Methods and Results One hundred consecutive patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, scheduled to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned before the intervention to receive an infusion of glutathione (2500 mg/25 mL over 10 minutes), followed by drug administration at the same doses at 24, 48, and 72 hours elapsing time or placebo. Total leukocytes, NOX2 (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase 2) activation, NO bioavailability, cTpT (serum cardiac troponin T), hsCRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), and TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor α) levels were measured. Left ventricular size and function were assessed within 120 minutes, 5 days, and 6 months from percutaneous coronary intervention. Following reperfusion, a significant reduction of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (<0.0001), hsCRP generation (<0.0001), NOX2 activation (<0.0001), TNF-α levels (<0.001), and cTpT release (<0.0001) were found in the glutathione group compared with placebo. In treated patients, blunted inflammatory response was linked to better left ventricular size and function at follow-up (=0.78, <0.005). Conclusions Early and prolonged glutathione infusion seems able to protect vital myocardial components and endothelial cell function against harmful pro-oxidant and inflammatory environments, thus preventing maladaptive cardiac repair and left ventricular adverse remodeling. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu; Unique identifier: 2014-004486-25.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649545 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020560 | DOI Listing |
Heart Rhythm
December 2024
Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address:
Background: Either dual antiplatelet therapy or oral anticoagulation in combination with aspirin represent recommended treatment regimens following left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). As the majority of patients receiving LAAC have high bleeding risk, less aggressive antithrombotic treatments are needed, such as single antiplatelet therapy.
Objectives: To compare both ischemic and bleeding outcomes in patients receiving single (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after successful LAAC.
Expert Opin Pharmacother
January 2025
Cardiovascular Research Unit, Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Introduction: Advances in pharmacotherapy for coronary thrombosis treatment and prevention have transformed the clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease but increased the complexity of therapeutic decision-making. Improvements in percutaneous coronary intervention techniques and stent design have reduced the incidence of thrombotic complications, which consequently has increased the challenge of adequately powering clinical trials of novel antithrombotic strategies for efficacy outcomes. Knowledge of the pathophysiology of coronary thrombosis and the characteristics of antithrombotic drugs can help with therapeutic decisions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEuroIntervention
January 2025
Hospital Clínico San Carlos IDISSC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red - Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Background: Safe deferral of revascularisation is a key aspect of physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While recent evidence gathered in the FAVOR III Europe trial showed that quantitative flow ratio (QFR) guidance did not meet non-inferiority to fractional flow reserve (FFR) guidance, it remains unknown if QFR might have a specific value in revascularisation deferral.
Aims: We aimed to evaluate the safety of coronary revascularisation deferral based on QFR as compared with FFR.
Eur Heart J
January 2025
Center of Excellence of Cardiovascular Sciences, Ospedale Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
January 2025
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (J.A.D., E.J.S., D.H.A.).
Background: Case-based peer review of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used by many hospitals for quality improvement and to make decisions regarding physician competency. However, there are no studies testing the reliability or validity of peer review for PCI performance evaluation.
Methods: We recruited interventional cardiologists from 12 Veterans Affairs Health System facilities throughout the United States to provide PCI cases for review.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!