AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzed dual antiplatelet therapy duration after stent placement for stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) using data from the GLOBAL LEADERS trial.
  • The experiment involved comparing an experimental strategy (1 month of dual therapy followed by ticagrelor monotherapy) against a reference strategy (12 months of dual therapy followed by aspirin monotherapy) across both patient groups.
  • Results showed similar efficacy between strategies for both SCAD and ACS, but the experimental approach reduced bleeding risk in ACS patients without benefiting SCAD patients.

Article Abstract

Background The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary drug-eluting stent placement in adults with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) versus acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains uncertain. Methods and Results This was a prespecified subgroup analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the experimental or reference strategy, stratified by ACS (experimental, n=3750; reference, n=3737) versus SCAD (experimental, n=4230; reference, n=4251). The experimental strategy was 75 to 100 mg aspirin daily plus 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily for 1 month, followed by 23 months of ticagrelor monotherapy. The reference strategy was 75 to 100 mg aspirin daily plus either 75 mg clopidogrel daily (for SCAD) or 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily (for ACS) for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months. The primary end point at 2 years was a composite of all-cause mortality or non-fatal centrally adjudicated new Q-wave myocardial infarction. The key secondary safety end point was site-reported Bleeding Academic Research Consortium grade 3 or 5 bleeding. The primary end point occurred in 147 (3.92%) versus 169 (4.52%) patients with ACS (rate ratio [RR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.69-1.08; =0.189), and in 157 (3.71%) versus 180 (4.23%) patients with SCAD (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.08; =0.221) with experimental and reference strategy, respectively (-interaction=0.926). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium grade 3 or 5 bleeding occurred in 73 (1.95%) versus 100 (2.68%) patients with ACS (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.98; =0.037), and in 90 (2.13%) versus 69 (1.62%) patients with SCAD (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.97-1.81; =0.081; -interaction=0.007). Conclusions While there was no evidence for differences in efficacy between treatment strategies by subgroup, the experimental strategy appeared to reduce bleeding risk in patients with ACS but not in patients with SCAD. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01813435.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649516PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015560DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reference strategy
12
patients acs
12
patients scad
12
ticagrelor monotherapy
8
analysis global
8
global leaders
8
leaders trial
8
experimental reference
8
experimental strategy
8
strategy 100 mg
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!