A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo in the assessment of sinonasal lesions: a comprehensive comparison of image quality in readout-segmented echo-planar imaging. | LitMetric

Background: A two-dimensional turbo gradient-echo and spin-echo diffusion-weighted pulse sequence with a non-Cartesian BLADE trajectory (TGSE BLADE) can eliminate image artifacts and distortion with clinically acceptable scan times. This process has the potential to overcome the shortcomings of current diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) techniques, especially in the sinonasal region.

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of TGSE BLADE in the assessment of sinonasal lesions and compare the quality of TGSE BLADE with RESOLVE images both qualitatively and quantitatively.

Material And Methods: A total of 36 patients with sinonasal lesions were included in this prospective study. DW images acquired using TGSE BLADE and RESOLVE were performed with the same acquisition time. Two independent observers evaluated the qualitative parameters (overall image quality, lesion visibility, and geometric distortion) and quantitative parameters (geometric distortion ratio [GDR], signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR], and apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] value) of the two sequences.

Results: Qualitative assessment revealed that TGSE BLADE exhibited higher overall image quality ( < 0.001) and lesion visibility ( < 0.001) and less geometric distortion ( < 0.001) than RESOLVE. Quantitative assessment showed that TGSE BLADE images exhibited higher contrast ( < 0.001) and CNR ( < 0.001) and lower GDR ( < 0.05) and SNR ( < 0.001) than RESOLVE images. The ADC value of TGSE BLADE was significantly lower than that of RESOLVE ( < 0.05).

Conclusion: TGSE BLADE can reduce susceptibility artifacts and geometric distortion more than RESOLVE and appears to be a promising diffusion imaging sequence for the assessment of sinonasal lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02841851211041820DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tgse blade
20
sinonasal lesions
12
image quality
12
assessment sinonasal
8
blade resolve
8
geometric distortion
8
blade
7
tgse
5
blade turbo
4
turbo gradient-
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!