AI Article Synopsis

  • The study looked at how a special program called ERAS helps people recover after emergency surgery for trauma.
  • Patients were split into two groups: one followed the ERAS program and the other received regular care.
  • Those in the ERAS group spent less time in the hospital but had similar recovery and pain levels compared to the regular care group.

Article Abstract

Background: The role of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been established in elective operations. However, its role in emergency operations especially in trauma is under-recognized. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of ERAS program in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for trauma.

Methods: In this single-center study, patients who underwent emergency laparotomy after trauma were randomized to the ERAS protocol or conventional care. The ERAS protocol included early removal of catheters, early initiation of diet, use of postoperative prophylaxis and optimal usage of analgesia. The primary endpoint was duration of hospital stay. The secondary endpoints were recovery of bowel function, pain scores, complications and readmission rate.

Results: Thirty patients were enrolled in each arm. The ERAS group had significant reduction in duration of hospital stay (3.3±1.3 vs. 5.0±1.7; p<0.01). Time to remove nasogastric tube (1.1±0.1 vs. 2.2±0.9; p<0.01), urinary catheter (1.1±0.1 vs. 3.5±1.6; p<0.01), and drain (1.0±0.2 vs. 3.7±1.6; p<0.01) was shorter in the ERAS group. In ERAS group, there was earlier initiation of liquid diet (1.1±0.1 vs. 2.3±1.0; p<0.01) and solid diet (2.1±0.1 vs. 3.6±1.3; p<0.01). The usage of epidural analgesia (63% vs. 30%; p=0.01), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (93% vs. 67%; p-0.02) and deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (100% vs. 70%; p<0.01) was higher in the ERAS group. There was no difference in the recovery of bowel function (2.4±1.0 vs. 2.1±0.9; p=0.15), pain scores (3.2±1.0 vs. 3.1±1.1; p=0.87), complications (27% vs. 23%; p=0.99) and readmission rates (07% vs. 10%; p=0.99) between the two groups.

Conclusion: ERAS protocol, when implemented in patients undergoing laparotomy for trauma, has decreased duration of hospital stay with no additional complications.

Level Of Evidence: Level 1, randomized controlled trial, care management.

Trial Registration Number: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2019/06/019533).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404432PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000698DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

emergency laparotomy
12
enhanced recovery
8
recovery surgery
8
surgery eras
8
patients undergoing
8
undergoing emergency
8
laparotomy trauma
8
eras protocol
8
duration hospital
8
hospital stay
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!