A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Shift of lakeshore cropland to buffer zones greatly reduced nitrogen loss from the soil profile caused by the interaction of lake water and shallow groundwater. | LitMetric

Shift of lakeshore cropland to buffer zones greatly reduced nitrogen loss from the soil profile caused by the interaction of lake water and shallow groundwater.

Sci Total Environ

Key Laboratory of Non-point Source Pollution Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China. Electronic address:

Published: January 2022

The interaction of lake water (LW) and shallow groundwater (SGW) accelerates nitrogen (N) loss from the soil profile in the lakeshore cropland, and cropland buffer zone (CBZ) significantly inhibits N loss in this area. Here, characteristics of N loss and transformations driven by SGW and LW interactions were explored using microcosmic experiments, and N loss was estimated using in situ monitoring data before and after the construction of the CBZ along the west bank of Erhai Lake. The results indicated that NO-N, dissolved organic N and total dissolved N sustained the main N losses in the soil, and the organic N was responsible for the main N loss in the effluent. The lower total nitrogen (TN) concentrations of SGW in this area, the greater the soil N loss. Moreover, N total loss from the 100 cm soil profile in the control check was 1.8 times that in the simulated SGW treatment. We found that nitrification, denitrification and anammox driven by the microbial community and N functional genes were the key processes leading to N loss. The effluent N (3.64%) and gaseous N (0.32%) loss ratios in the cropland for continuously growing vegetables (CGV) were much higher than that in the CBZ (1.07% of effluent N and 0.25% of gaseous N loss ratios). If a 100 m wide and 48 km long area of lakeshore cropland is CGV, an increase by 47% is projected by 2030 compared with the N loss in 2020. But this region was built as a 100 m wide CBZ or 50 m wide CBZ + 50 m wide CGV after 2019, N loss will be reduced by 87% and 44% in 2030 compared with the N loss in CGV. The results implied that restoring a suitable width of CBZ can significantly reduce N loss.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150093DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

loss
15
lakeshore cropland
12
soil profile
12
cropland buffer
8
nitrogen loss
8
loss soil
8
interaction lake
8
lake water
8
water shallow
8
shallow groundwater
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!