A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Characterization of the Ultrasound Localization Microscopy Resolution Limit in the Presence of Image Degradation. | LitMetric

Ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) has been able to overcome the diffraction limit of ultrasound imaging. The resolution limit of ULM has been previously modeled using the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB). While this model has been validated in a homogeneous medium, it estimates a resolution limit, which has not yet been achieved in vivo. In this work, we investigated the effects of three sources of image degradation on the resolution limit of ULM. The Fullwave simulation tool was used to simulate acquisitions of transabdominal contrast-enhanced data at depth. The effects of reverberation clutter, trailing clutter, and phase aberration were studied. The resolution limit, in the presence of reverberation clutter alone, was empirically measured to be up to 39 times worse in the axial dimension and up to 2.1 times worse in the lateral dimension than the limit predicted by the CRLB. While reverberation clutter had an isotropic impact on the resolution, trailing clutter had a constant impact on both dimensions across all signal-to-trailing-clutter ratios (STCR). Phase aberration had a significant impact on the resolution limit over the studied analysis ranges. Phase aberration alone degraded the resolution limit up to 70 and 160 [Formula: see text] in the lateral and axial dimensions, respectively. These results illustrate the importance of phase aberration correction and clutter filtering in ULM postprocessing. The analysis results were demonstrated through the simulation of the ULM process applied to a cross-tube model that was degraded by each of the three aforementioned sources of degradation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3112074DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

resolution limit
28
phase aberration
16
reverberation clutter
12
limit
9
ultrasound localization
8
localization microscopy
8
resolution
8
limit presence
8
image degradation
8
limit ulm
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!