Objective: The purpose of the study was to compare results and evaluate the agreement between the endpoint fluorescence (EPF) method and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) during molecular monitoring of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) receiving treatment.
Materials And Methods: The study was conducted at Molecular Lab of Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan, from January 2017 to December 2018. A total of 150 blood specimens from 30 patients with CML were analyzed at regular intervals during therapy. The detection/quantification of transcript mRNA was done simultaneously using QPCR and the EPF method.
Results: Out of a total of 150 RNA specimens analyzed, 117 (78%) specimens were positive, whereas 33 (22%) were negative for the transcript using both methods at various stages of treatment. Strong linear negative correlations between the cycle threshold and relative fluorescence unit values were observed with P <.0001 at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of treatment. No significant difference (P >.05) between the means of the BCR-ABL percentage was observed in either method at all stages of treatment. The bias between the 2 methods was calculated as 0.069 ± 3.50, and 95% limits of agreement were 6.92% to -6.79%.
Conclusion: We found that EPF is s simple method to detect/quantify BCR-ABL mRNA expression during treatment with comparable results to QPCR.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmab075 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!