Effect of Changes in MS Diagnostic Criteria Over 25 Years on Time to Treatment and Prognosis in Patients With Clinically Isolated Syndrome.

Neurology

From the Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology (M.T., A.C.-C., P.C., G.A., S.O.-R., J.R., C.T., M.C., C.N., M.J.A., L.M., I.G., A.V.-J., J.C., B.R.-A., A.Z., J.S.-G., X.M.) Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), and Department of Radiology (IDI) (A.S., C.A., À.R.), Section of Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.

Published: October 2021

Background And Objectives: To explore whether time to diagnosis, time to treatment initiation, and age to reach disability milestones have changed in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) according to different multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria periods.

Methods: This retrospective study was based on data collected prospectively from the Barcelona-CIS cohort between 1994 and 2020. Patients were classified into 5 periods according to different MS criteria, and the times to MS diagnosis and treatment initiation were evaluated. The age at which patients with MS reached an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≥3.0 was assessed by Cox regression analysis according to diagnostic criteria periods. Last, to remove the classic Will Rogers phenomenon by which the use of different MS criteria over time might result in a changes of prognosis, the 2017 McDonald criteria were applied, and age at EDSS score ≥3.0 was assessed by Cox regression.

Results: In total, 1,174 patients were included. The median time from CIS to MS diagnosis and from CIS to treatment initiation showed a 77% and 82% reduction from the Poser to the McDonald 2017 diagnostic criteria periods, respectively. Patients of a given age diagnosed in more recent diagnostic criteria periods had a lower risk of reaching an EDSS score ≥3.0 than patients of the same age diagnosed in earlier diagnostic periods (reference category Poser period): adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.24-0.90) for McDonald 2001, aHR 0.25 (0.12-0.54) for McDonald 2005, aHR 0.30 (0.12-0.75) for McDonald 2010, and aHR 0.07 (0.01-0.45) for McDonald 2017. Patients in the early-treatment group displayed an aHR of 0.53 (0.33-0.85) of reaching age at EDSS score ≥3.0 compared to those in the late-treatment group. Changes in prognosis together with early-treatment effect were maintained after the exclusion of possible bias derived from the use of different diagnostic criteria over time (Will Rogers phenomenon).

Discussion: A continuous decrease in the time to MS diagnosis and treatment initiation was observed across diagnostic criteria periods. Overall, patients diagnosed in more recent diagnostic criteria periods displayed a lower risk of reaching disability. The prognostic improvement is maintained after the Will Rogers phenomenon is discarded, and early treatment appears to be the most likely contributing factor.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012726DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic criteria
32
criteria periods
20
treatment initiation
16
edss score
16
score ≥30
16
will rogers
12
criteria
11
patients
9
time treatment
8
patients clinically
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!