AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the EORTC QLQ-HCC18 questionnaire to measure quality of life in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma during a clinical trial involving the drug tislelizumab.
  • Various psychometric properties were analyzed, including reliability, validity, and the ability to detect meaningful changes in patients' health over time.
  • Results showed strong internal consistency and reliability for certain domains, with effective differentiation in quality of life changes related to fatigue and body image, indicating the questionnaire's effectiveness in measuring patient experiences.

Article Abstract

To demonstrate the measurement properties of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18-question module (EORTC QLQ-HCC18) within a previously treated, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) clinical trial population that was distinct from the published QLQ-HCC18 validation population. Analyses were conducted using data from BGB-A317-208, an open label, international, clinical trial assessing efficacy and safety of the monoclonal antibody tislelizumab in adult HCC patients. The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and QLQ-HCC18 instruments were assessed at baseline and weeks 3 and 9 follow-up visits. Per US Food and Drug Administration guidance, psychometric validation of the QLQ-HCC18 included reliability (internal consistency and test-retest), construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity and known-groups validity), ability to detect change, and meaningful within-patient change (MWPC). Known-groups validity and MWPC analyses were also stratified on several pre-defined subgroups. A total of 248 patients were included. Only the QLQ-HCC18 fatigue, nutrition, and index domains demonstrated acceptable internal consistency; acceptable test-retest reliability was found for fatigue, body image, nutrition, pain, sexual interest, and index domains. The QLQ-HCC18 fatigue domain achieved the pre-specified criterion defining acceptable convergent and discriminant validity for 13 of 16 correlations, whereas the index domain achieved the pre-specified criterion for 14 of 16 correlations. Clear differentiation of the QLQ-HCC18 change scores between improvement and maintenance anchor groups were observed for body image, fatigue, pain, and index domains, whereas differentiation between deterioration and maintenance anchor groups were observed for fever and fatigue domains. MWPC point estimates defining improvement for the QLQ-HCC18 fatigue and index domains were -7.18 and -4.07, respectively; MWPC point estimates defining deterioration were 5.34 and 3.16, respectively. The EORTC QLQ-HCC18 fatigue and index domains consistently demonstrated robust psychometric properties, supporting the use of these domains as suitable patient-reported endpoints within a previously treated, unresectable HCC patient population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8921023PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02992-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

qlq-hcc18 fatigue
16
eortc qlq-hcc18
12
treated unresectable
12
hepatocellular carcinoma
12
fatigue domains
12
qlq-hcc18
10
psychometric validation
8
unresectable hepatocellular
8
quality life
8
life questionnaire
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!