AI Article Synopsis

  • Previous LVAD models often excluded patients with small body sizes due to anatomical concerns, but outcomes for smaller patients using the HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD are not well understood.
  • A study analyzed 220 patients, dividing them into small body surface area (BSA ≤1.8 m) and large BSA groups, focusing on characteristics and clinical outcomes such as survival and complications.
  • Results showed that while small BSA patients had different baseline traits and some lower pump metrics, their survival rates and adverse event incidences were similar to larger patients, suggesting small BSA shouldn't exclude candidates for HM3 LVAD.

Article Abstract

Background: Due to anatomic and physiologic concerns, prior generations of the left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have frequently been denied to patients with small body size. However, outcomes in patients with small body surface area (BSA) following HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD implantation remain relatively unknown.

Methods: A cohort of 220 patients implanted at a single center was divided into two groups: BSA ≤1.8 m (small BSA, n = 37) and BSA >1.8 m (large BSA, n = 183). We investigated baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes including survival and incidence of adverse events.

Results: Small BSA patients were older (60 vs. 57 years), more likely female (60% vs. 20%), had a lower body mass index (24 vs. 32 kg/m ), lower incidence of diabetes (32% vs. 51%), history of stroke (5% vs. 19%), and left ventricular thrombus (0% vs. 11%). They had smaller left ventricular end diastolic diameter (64.8 vs. 69.3 mm). Pump speed and pump flows at discharge were lower in the small BSA group. Survival at 1 year and 2 years was 86% versus 87% and 86% versus 79% for small versus large BSA groups (p = 0.408), respectively. The rates of adverse events were similar between groups and there were no cases of confirmed pump thrombosis. The incidence of readmissions for low flow alarms was higher in the small BSA group (0.55 vs. 0.24 EPPY).

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate comparable outcomes in patients with small body size and suggest that this parameter should not be an exclusion criterion on patients who are otherwise candidates for HM3 LVAD implantation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14065DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

left ventricular
16
small bsa
16
outcomes patients
12
patients small
12
small body
12
bsa
9
body surface
8
surface area
8
ventricular assist
8
small
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!