AI Article Synopsis

  • Neurogenic bladder dysfunction is a significant issue in children, particularly those with spina bifida, leading to serious complications like UTIs and kidney problems.
  • There is no clear consensus on the best way to manage this condition, but the main goals include preserving kidney function, achieving continence, and ensuring functional independence.
  • A narrative literature review suggests a proactive management strategy, which involves early evaluations and interventions, may offer better preventative outcomes compared to a more reserved expectant approach.

Article Abstract

Neurogenic bladder dysfunction is a major source of urologic morbidity in children, especially in those with spina bifida (SB). Complications from progression of bladder dysfunction can include urinary tract infections (UTIs), urinary incontinence, upper tract deterioration, and renal dysfunction or failure. In these children, there has been a recent trend toward proactive rather than expectant management of neurogenic bladder. However, there is a lack of consensus on how to best achieve the three main goals of neurogenic bladder management: 1) preserving kidney function, 2) achieving continence (if desired by the family/individual), and 3) achieving social and functional urologic independence (if appropriate). Hence, our objective was to perform a narrative literature review to evaluate the approaches to diagnosis and management of pediatric neurogenic bladder dysfunction, with special focus on children with SB. The approach strategies vary across a spectrum, with a proactive strategy on one end of the spectrum and an expectant strategy at the other end. The proactive management strategy is characterized by early and frequent labs, imaging, and urodynamic (UDS) evaluation, with early initiation of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and proceeding with pharmacotherapy, or surgery if indicated. The expectant management strategy prioritizes surveillance labs and imaging prior to proceeding with invasive assessments and interventions such as UDS or pharmacotherapy. Both treatment strategies are currently utilized and data have historically been inconclusive in demonstrating efficacy of one regimen over the other. We performed a narrative literature evaluating proactive and expectant treatment strategies as they relate to diagnostics and management of Spina Bifida. From the available literature and our practice, a proactive strategy favors greater benefit in preventative management and may decrease risk of renal dysfunction compared with expectant management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8421253PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S259307DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neurogenic bladder
20
bladder dysfunction
16
expectant management
12
management
9
diagnosis management
8
management pediatric
8
pediatric neurogenic
8
spina bifida
8
renal dysfunction
8
proactive expectant
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!