Background: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is crucial for interpreting meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). No previous study has evaluated the MCID for the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to propose the OKS MCID for revision TKA.
Methods: Prospectively collected data from 191 patients who underwent revision TKA at a single institution was analysed. Clinical assessment was performed preoperatively and at 2 years using OKS and Short-Form 36 Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS). MCID was evaluated with a three-pronged methodology, using (1) anchor-based method with linear regression, (2) anchor-based method with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under curve (AUC), (3) distribution-based method with standard deviation (SD). The anchors used were improvement in SF-36 PCS ≥ 12, patient satisfaction, and implant survivorship following revision TKA.
Results: The MCID determined by anchor-based linear regression method using improvements in SF-36 PCS was 4.9 points. The MCID determined by anchor-based ROC was 10.5 points for satisfaction (AUC = 74.8%) and 13.5 points for implant survivorship (AUC = 73.7%). The MCID determined by distribution-based method of 0.5 SD was 4.7.
Conclusion: The proposed MCID for OKS following revision TKA is 4.9 points. Patients who achieve an improvement in OKS of at least 10.5-13.5 points by 2 years are likely to be satisfied with their surgery and not require a subsequent re-revision TKA. Patients undergoing revision TKA should aim for an improvement in OKS of at least 10.5-13.5 points as a target score.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2021.08.020 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Are Current Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Fit for Purpose to Evaluate Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty?
J Clin Med
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Golden Jubilee University National Hospital, Glasgow G81 4DY, UK.
The optimal procedure for isolated end-stage medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) remains uncertain, with debate persisting between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate current outcome measures in knee arthroplasty (KA) and explore how evolving patient populations and technological advancements may necessitate the use of different patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for evaluating UKA. While UKA offers potential advantages over TKA in early pain relief and functional outcomes, most randomised control trials using traditional PROMs have failed to show definitive superiority.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStem fixation techniques in revision total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Exp Orthop
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Città della Salute e della Scienza Turin Italy.
Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) using uncemented press-fit stems (hybrid fixation) versus cemented stems (cemented fixation). It is also examined whether cemented fixation offers any superiority over hybrid fixation regarding implant survival, clinical function, imaging analysis and complication rates.
Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on five databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Medline and Cochrane).
Purpose: Double-level osteotomies (DLOs) have shown promising results for knee joint preservation, however, most ultimately progress in terms of degenerative disease resulting in conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the time to TKA conversion, long-term clinical outcomes and revision rates of patients who have undergone TKA after prior ipsilateral DLO.
Methods: Patients who underwent simultaneous or staged DLO and subsequently underwent conversion to TKA at a single academic institution from 1997 to 2022 were evaluated.
Effects of personalized 3D-printed blocks in total knee arthroplasty and revision surgery for massive bone defects: a single-center retrospective study.
J Int Med Res
January 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, PR China.
Objective: To analyze the early- to mid-term clinical efficacy of personalized 3D-printed structural metal spacer technology in reconstructing massive bone defects during complex total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and revision surgery.
Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on nine patients with severe bone defects who underwent TKA between 2018 and 2024. The general condition, surgical details, and clinical improvement of these patients were recorded and analyzed by clinical doctors.
The Etiology of Total Knee Arthroplasty Failure Influences on Improvement in Knee Function: A Follow-Up Study.
J Clin Med
December 2024
Department of Orthopedics, Klinik Penzing, Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, 1140 Vienna, Austria.
Outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revisions are variable, and it is hypothesized that the underlying cause of primary TKA failure impacts postoperative outcomes. This study analyzes the results of TKA revisions seven years after surgery, in relation to the etiology of primary failure and other influencing factors. A previous study conducted in 2013 examined the same cohort of patients three months after revision surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!