Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The choice of first‐line palliative treatment has always been one of the crucial decisions in the management of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck not suitable for salvage surgery or full‐dose radiotherapy. This commentary highlights trial results that show the importance of treatment sequencing decisions that should be of interest for daily practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571739 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/onco.13966 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!