AI Article Synopsis

  • - The HUD implemented a smoke-free rule in public housing in July 2018, and a study evaluated perceptions of this rule's first year in the District of Columbia among residents and administrators through focus groups and interviews.
  • - Major themes identified include support for the rule due to health benefits, the importance of reducing secondhand smoke for vulnerable residents, and the need for better communication and cessation resources.
  • - While most participants viewed the rule positively, challenges such as clarification of enforcement, improved signage, and addressing safety concerns were highlighted as necessary for better implementation.

Article Abstract

In July 2018, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) implemented a mandatory smoke-free rule in public housing. This study assessed administrator and resident perceptions of rule implementation during its initial year in the District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA). Assessment included nine focus groups ( = 69) with residents and in-depth interviews with administrators ( = 7) and residents ( = 26) from 14 DCHA communities (family = 7 and senior/disabled = 7). Semi-structured discussion guides based on the multi-level socio-ecological framework captured dialogue that was recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded inductively. Emerging major themes for each socio-ecological framework level included: (1) Individual: the rule was supported due to perceived health benefits, with stronger support among non-smokers; (2) Interpersonal: limiting secondhand smoke exposure was perceived as a positive for vulnerable residents; (3) Organizational: communication, signage, and cessation support was perceived as a need; (4) Community: residents perceived mobility, disability, weather, and safety-related issues as barriers; and (5) Public Policy: lease amendments were perceived as enablers of rule implementation but expressed confusion about violations and enforcement. A majority of administrators and residents reported favorable implications of the mandated HUD rule. The novel application of a socio-ecological framework, however, detected implementation nuances that required improvements on multiple levels, including more signage, cessation support, clarification of enforcement roles, and addressing safety concerns.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8431491PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178908DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

socio-ecological framework
12
department housing
8
housing urban
8
smoke-free rule
8
administrator resident
8
resident perceptions
8
rule implementation
8
administrators residents
8
signage cessation
8
cessation support
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!