Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome after humeral head preserving surgical treatment of posterior fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus.
Methods: Patients with a posterior fracture dislocation of the proximal humerus that were operatively treated in two level-1 trauma centers within a timeframe of 8 years were identified. With a minimum follow-up of 2 years, patients with humeral head preserving surgical treatment were invited for examination.
Results: 19/24 fractures (79.2%; mean age 43 years) were examined with a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.1 years. Of these, 12 fractures were categorized as posteriorly dislocated impression type fractures, and 7 fractures as posteriorly dislocated surgical neck fractures. Most impression type fractures were treated by open reduction, allo- or autograft impaction and screw fixation ( = 11), while most surgical neck fractures were treated with locked plating ( = 6). Patients with impression type fractures showed significantly better ASES scores ( = 0.041), Simple Shoulder Test scores ( = 0.003), Rowe scores ( = 0.013) and WOSI scores ( = 0.023), when compared to posteriorly dislocated surgical neck fractures. Range of motion was good to excellent for both groups with no significant difference.
Conclusions: This mid-term follow-up study reports good to very good clinical results for humeral head preserving treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432246 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173841 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!