Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome after humeral head preserving surgical treatment of posterior fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus.

Methods: Patients with a posterior fracture dislocation of the proximal humerus that were operatively treated in two level-1 trauma centers within a timeframe of 8 years were identified. With a minimum follow-up of 2 years, patients with humeral head preserving surgical treatment were invited for examination.

Results: 19/24 fractures (79.2%; mean age 43 years) were examined with a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.1 years. Of these, 12 fractures were categorized as posteriorly dislocated impression type fractures, and 7 fractures as posteriorly dislocated surgical neck fractures. Most impression type fractures were treated by open reduction, allo- or autograft impaction and screw fixation ( = 11), while most surgical neck fractures were treated with locked plating ( = 6). Patients with impression type fractures showed significantly better ASES scores ( = 0.041), Simple Shoulder Test scores ( = 0.003), Rowe scores ( = 0.013) and WOSI scores ( = 0.023), when compared to posteriorly dislocated surgical neck fractures. Range of motion was good to excellent for both groups with no significant difference.

Conclusions: This mid-term follow-up study reports good to very good clinical results for humeral head preserving treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432246PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173841DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

humeral head
16
head preserving
16
posterior fracture
12
posteriorly dislocated
12
impression type
12
type fractures
12
surgical neck
12
neck fractures
12
fractures
9
fracture dislocations
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!