Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Relapse is a substantial problem in eating disorders. Until recently, there have been few investigations into maintenance treatments aimed at helping patients maintain improvements made in treatment. This study compared the outcomes of group-based intensive outpatient versus individual cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based maintenance treatments for eating disorders, following inpatient or day treatment. In this sequential cohort study, patients received the type of maintenance treatment (intensive outpatient group or individual CBT) available at the time. A total of 221 patients with eating disorders were included, and data were examined retrospectively. Cox regression was used to determine whether treatment type predicted rate of return to clinically significant symptoms over the 12 months following inpatient or day treatment. Intensive outpatient group versus individual CBT maintenance treatment did not predict differential rate or trajectory of return to clinically significant symptoms in diagnostic subgroups and the overall sample. Maintenance treatment type did not predict changes in weight/shape concerns between end-of-inpatient or day treatment) and 6- or 12-month follow-up (after controlling for diagnosis). Although the treatments appeared similarly effective in helping patients maintain gains made in intensive treatment, individual CBT may be a more time- and cost-efficient approach to delivering maintenance treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2021.1969787 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!