Radiomic Score as a Potential Imaging Biomarker for Predicting Survival in Patients With Cervical Cancer.

Objectives: Accurate prediction of prognosis will help adjust or optimize the treatment of cervical cancer and benefit the patients. We aimed to investigate the incremental value of radiomics when added to the FIGO stage in predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with cervical cancer.

Methods: This retrospective study included 106 patients with cervical cancer (FIGO stage IB1-IVa) between October 2017 and May 2019. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort ( = 74) and validation cohort ( = 32). All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) prior to treatment. The ITK-SNAP software was used to delineate the region of interest on pre-treatment standard-of-care CT scans. We extracted 792 two-dimensional radiomic features by the Analysis Kit (AK) software. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis and Relief were used to detect the most discriminatory features. The radiomic signature (i.e., Radscore) was constructed Adaboost with Leave-one-out cross-validation. Prognostic models were built by Cox regression model using Akaike information criterion (AIC) as the stopping rule. A nomogram was established to individually predict the OS of patients. Patients were then stratified into high- and low-risk groups according to the Youden index. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the survival difference between the high- and low-risk groups.

Results: Six textural features were identified, including one gray-level co-occurrence matrix feature and five gray-level run-length matrix features. Only the FIGO stage and Radscore were independent risk factors associated with OS ( < 0.05). The C-index of the FIGO stage in the training and validation cohorts was 0.703 (95% CI: 0.572-0.834) and 0.700 (95% CI: 0.526-0.874), respectively. Correspondingly, the C-index of Radscore was 0.794 (95% CI: 0.707-0.880) and 0.754 (95% CI: 0.623-0.885). The incorporation of the FIGO stage and Radscore achieved better performance, with a C-index of 0.830 (95% CI: 0.738-0.922) and 0.772 (95% CI: 0.615-0.929), respectively. The nomogram based on the FIGO stage and Radscore could individually predict the OS probability with good discrimination and calibration. The high-risk patients had shorter OS compared with the low-risk patients ( < 0.05).

Conclusion: Radiomics has the potential for noninvasive risk stratification and may improve the prediction of OS in patients with cervical cancer when added to the FIGO stage.