A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

"The odds were stacked against me": a qualitative study of underrepresented minorities in surgical training. | LitMetric

"The odds were stacked against me": a qualitative study of underrepresented minorities in surgical training.

ANZ J Surg

Surgical Education, Austin Precinct, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Published: October 2021

Background: The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) is expected to provide surgical care to a diverse patient population across Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). To improve the quality-of-care individuals receive, the surgical workforce must reflect the population it serves. Achieving diversity within RACS will strengthen therapeutic relationships with patients and promote an inclusive culture. This study investigates the perspectives of underrepresented minority (URM) trainees to highlight barriers for the selection and completion of the RACS Surgical Education and Training (SET) program.

Methods: This qualitative study used online, semi-structured, in-depth interviews of URM trainees. Participants were recruited by self-identification and were invited to participate based on inclusion criterion. Interviews took place between August and October 2020, were transcribed and de-identified. Framework analysis was used to identify themes.

Findings: Eight participants from four surgical specialities were interviewed, six from Australia and two from New Zealand. There were six female and two male participants. The findings identified barriers that were grouped into eight broad areas: discouragement; structural racism, discrimination and unconscious bias; language barriers; policies and procedures; lack of role models; homophobia; sexual harassment and women in surgery.

Conclusion: The findings offer guidance to RACS and the surgical community to explore new strategies to improve the experience of URM SET trainees. While on a small scale, the study draws directly on the URMs' experiences to inform strategies addressing equity, diversity and inclusion. The aim is to produce a diverse surgical workforce that better delivers healthcare services to a diverse population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17168DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

qualitative study
8
australia zealand
8
surgical workforce
8
urm trainees
8
racs surgical
8
surgical
7
"the odds
4
odds stacked
4
stacked me"
4
me" qualitative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!