Restorative treatment in recent times has seen a paradigm shift due to minimally invasive adhesive dentistry. With advent of material science, bonding mechanisms, and superior isolation techniques, treatments based entirely on adhesion are effectively attainable. The choice between direct and indirect restorative technique, mainly in posterior areas, is still a challenge and involves biomechanical, anatomical, functional, esthetic, and economic considerations. The rationale of this case report is to demonstrate a revised cavity design based on morphological principles in terms of geometry (height of contour and cuspal inclines) and structure (dentinoenamel junction morphology) inspired from conventional preparation techniques.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378497PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_489_20DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

technique posterior
8
morphology-driven preparation
4
preparation technique
4
posterior indirect
4
indirect bonded
4
bonded restorations
4
restorations restorative
4
restorative treatment
4
treatment times
4
times paradigm
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!