A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Alternative method for canagliflozin oxidation analysis using an electrochemical flow cell - Comparative study. | LitMetric

This paper highlights the potential of electrochemical flow cells for oxidative-stress testing of active pharmaceutical ingredients using canagliflozin as a model substance. Based on design of experiments, we developed our method through a reduced combinatorial design, optimizing the following independent variables: cell size, electrolyte flow rate, electrolyte concentration, and electrolyte pH. Using ammonium phosphate buffer with methanol in a 50/50 vol ratio as a working electrolyte, we electrochemically oxidized samples and analyzed them by high-performance liquid chromatography, considering the following dependent variables: peak area of each impurity, peak area of canagliflozin, and the percentage of the corresponding peak areas. Our results showed that the most significant independent variables were electrolyte pH and flow rate. By data optimization, we determined the most suitable conditions for electrochemical oxidation of canagliflozin, namely 50 µm cell size, 300 mM electrolyte concentration, 0.1 mL/h electrolyte flow rate, and electrolyte pH = 4. The repeatability of the method, expressed as the relative standard deviation of the canagliflozin peak area, measured in ten separately oxidized samples, was 1.64%. For comparison purposes, we performed a degradation experiment using hydrogen peroxide, identifying five identical impurities in both cases, as confirmed by mass spectrometry. The degradation products formed when using the chemical method after 1, 3, and 7 days totaled 0.09%, 0.75%, and 3.75%, respectively, and the degradation products formed when using the electrochemical method after 3 h totaled 3.11%. Oxidation with hydrogen peroxide required 7 days, whereas electrochemical oxidation was completed in 3 h. Overall, the electrochemical method significantly saves time and reduces the consumption of active ingredients and solvents thanks to the miniaturized size of the electrochemical cell, thereby minimizing the costs of forced degradation studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114341DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electrolyte flow
12
flow rate
12
peak area
12
electrochemical flow
8
independent variables
8
cell size
8
electrolyte
8
rate electrolyte
8
electrolyte concentration
8
oxidized samples
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!