Addressing Unusual Assay Variability with Robust Statistics.

SLAS Discov

QualSci Consulting, LLC, Carmel, IN, USA.

Published: December 2021

Well-behaved, in vitro bioassays generally produce normally distributed values in their primary (efficacy) data. Accordingly, the best practices for statistical analysis are well documented and understood. However, assays may occasionally display unusually high variability and fall outside the assumptions inherent in these standard analyses. These assays may still be in the optimization phase, in which the source of variation could be identified and addressed. They might also represent the best available option to address the biological process being examined. In these cases, the use of robust statistical methods may provide a more appropriate set of tools for both data analysis and assay optimization. This article provides guidance on best practices for the use of robust statistical methods for the analysis of bioassay data as an alternative to standard methods. Impacts on experimental design and interpretation will be discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24725552211038379DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

best practices
8
robust statistical
8
statistical methods
8
addressing unusual
4
unusual assay
4
assay variability
4
variability robust
4
robust statistics
4
statistics well-behaved
4
well-behaved vitro
4

Similar Publications

Patient safety is the foundation of spine surgery, where the intricate nature of spinal procedures and the unique risks involved call for exceptional diligence and comprehensive protocols. In this high-stakes field, developing and implementing rigorous safety protocols is not only vital for minimizing complications but also for achieving the best possible outcomes and strengthening the confidence patients have in their care team. Each patient entrusts their well-being to their surgical team.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effective community engagement in one health research in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

One Health Outlook

January 2025

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Background: The one health (OH) approach, linking human, animal, and environmental health, relies on effective community engagement (CE), education, stewardship, and effective regional and global partnerships. For real impact, communities should be at the centre of research agenda setting and program implementation. This review aimed at synthesizing empirical evidence on how communities are involved in one health research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A systematic appraisal of the comparative efficacy and safety profiles of naso-intestinal tube versus gastric tube feeding in the context of enteral nutrition for mechanically ventilated (MV) patients is imperative. Such an evaluation is essential to inform clinical practice, ensuring that the chosen method of nutritional support is both optimal and safe for this patient population.

Methods: We executed an exhaustive search across PubMed et al.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Exploring the barriers to cervical screening and perspectives on new self-sampling methods amongst under-served groups.

BMC Health Serv Res

January 2025

NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, Centre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Greater Manchester, England, UK.

Background: Cervical screening rates have fallen in recent years in the UK, representing a health inequity for some under-served groups. Self-sampling alternatives to cervical screening may be useful where certain barriers prohibit access to routine cervical screening. However, there is limited evidence on whether self-sampling methods address known barriers to cervical screening and subsequently increase uptake amongst under-screened groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Strong partnerships, community engagement, and multisectoral collaboration in the health supply chain are synergistic pillars towards achieving universal health coverage. In Rwanda, the health supply chain involves the collaboration of various stakeholders, including distributors, manufacturers, wholesalers, and customers. However, since the eruption and ending of COVID-19, there has not been any study to assess stakeholders' perspectives on the status of the benefits, challenges, and best practices of collaborative partnerships among health supply chain stakeholders in Rwanda.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!