Aim: The aim of this study was to determine clinician opinion regarding oxygen management in moderate-late preterm resuscitation.

Methods: An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed through email/social messaging platforms to neonatologists in 21 countries (October 2020-March 2021) via REDCap.

Results: Of the 695 respondents, 69% had access to oxygen blenders and 90% had pulse oximeters. Respondents from high-income countries were more likely to have oxygen blenders than those from middle-income countries (72% vs. 66%). Most initiated respiratory support with FiO 0.21 (43%) or 0.3 (36%) but only 45% titrated FiO to target SpO . Most (89%) considered heart rate as a more important indicator of response than SpO . Almost all (96%) supported the need for well-designed trials to examine oxygenation in moderate-late preterm resuscitation.

Conclusion: Most clinicians resuscitated moderate-late preterm infants with lower initial FiO but some cannot/will not target SpO or titrate FiO . Most consider heart rate as a more important indicator of infant response than SpO .Large and robust clinical trials examining oxygen use for moderate-late preterm resuscitation, including long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, are supported amongst clinicians.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.16091DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

moderate-late preterm
16
respiratory support
8
preterm infants
8
oxygen blenders
8
target spo
8
heart rate
8
rate indicator
8
response spo
8
oxygen
5
preterm
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!