Purpose: Despite the advancements in the reinforcement and closure techniques available, complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) remains a challenging surgical undertaking with considerable risk of postoperative complications. Biological meshes were developed that may help to complement standard closure techniques and offer an alternative to synthetic meshes, which carry significant risks with their use in complex cases.

Patients And Methods: A total of 114 patients underwent surgical treatment for CAWR with a Permacolâ„¢ (a biologic surgical implant). The study objective was to evaluate the short-term (6 months), mid-term (12-24 months), and long-term (36 months) clinical outcomes (through 36 months) associated with the use of a biologic surgical implant in these cases.

Results: The cumulative hernia recurrence rate was 18.7% (17/91) at 24 months and 22.4% (19/85) at 36 months. Twelve (14.1%) subjects required reoperation for hernia repair within 36 months for repair of recurrent hernias. Between 6- and 36-months post-surgery, patients reported improvement in their Carolina comfort scale (CSS) measures of severity of pain, sensation of mesh, and movement limitations.

Conclusion: A biologic surgical implant can provide long-term benefit to complex abdominal wall repairs in patients staged grade III according to the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403569PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S297897DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biologic surgical
16
surgical implant
16
complex abdominal
12
abdominal wall
12
closure techniques
8
months
7
surgical
5
biologic
4
implant
4
complex
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!