Objective: Monosodium uric acid (MSU) crystals may accumulate in the coronary plaque. The objective was to assess whether dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) allows for detection of MSU in coronary plaque.

Methods: Patients were examined with 128-slice DECT applying a cardiac electrocardiogram-gated and peripheral extremity protocol. Patients were divided into 3 groups: gout (tophi >1 cm in peripheral joints), hyperuricemia (>6.5 mg/dL serum uric acid), and controls. The groups were matched for cardiovascular risk factors. Monosodium uric acid-positive (+) and calcified plaque were distinguished, and the coronary artery calcium score was calculated. Ex vivo phantom: MSU solutions were diluted in different NaCL solutions (5%/10%/15%/20%/25%). Coronary artery models with 2 different plaque types (MSU+ and calcified) were created.

Results: A total of 96 patients were included (37 with gout, 33 with hyperuricemia, and 26 controls). Monosodium uric acid-positive plaques were found more often in patients with gout as compared with controls (91.9% vs 0.38%; P < 0.0001), and the number of plaques was higher (P < 0.0001). Of 102 MSU+ plaques, 26.7% were only MSU+ and 74.2% were mixed MSU+/calcified. Monosodium uric acid-positive plaque had mean 232.3 Hounsfield units (range, 213-264). Coronary artery calcium score was higher in patients with gout as compared with controls (659.1 vs 112.4 Agatston score; P < 0.001). Patients with gout had more MSU+ plaques as compared with patients with hyperuricemia (91.6% vs 2.9%; P < 0.0001), and coronary artery calcium score was higher (659.1 vs 254 Agatston score; P < 0.001), but there was no difference between patients with hyperuricemia and controls. Ex vivo phantom study: MSU crystals were detected by DECT in solutions with a concentration of 15% or greater MSU and could be distinguished from calcified.

Conclusions: Coronary MSU+ plaques can be detected by DECT in patients with gout.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001222DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coronary artery
20
monosodium uric
16
patients gout
16
vivo phantom
12
uric acid-positive
12
artery calcium
12
calcium score
12
msu+ plaques
12
patients
9
coronary
8

Similar Publications

Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography (PET) can be used for the assessment of myocardial perfusion. Compared to other cardiac imaging techniques, notably Single Photon Emission Computer Tomography (SPECT), cardiac PET offers superior image resolution, higher accuracy, quantitative measures of myocardial perfusion, lower radiation exposure, and shorter image acquisition time. However, PET tends to be costlier and less widely available than SPECT due to the specialized equipment needed for generating the necessary radiotracers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating advancements in diagnostic techniques. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a pivotal non-invasive tool for evaluating coronary artery anatomy and detecting atherosclerotic plaque burden with high spatial resolution. This review explores the evolution of CCTA, highlighting its technological advancements, clinical applications, and challenges.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Which Test is Best for Pain in the Chest?

R I Med J (2013)

February 2025

Professor of Medicine, Clinician Educator, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University; Associate Chief, Cardiology, Brown University Health Cardiovascular Institute, Providence, Rhode Island.

Chest pain is one of the most common chief complaints seen in both the emergency department (ED) and primary care settings.1,2 It is estimated that 20-40% of the general population will suffer from chest pain at some point throughout their lives.3 Interestingly although obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence has declined, chest pain as a presenting symptom has become increasingly common over the last decade.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Update in Cardiovascular Prevention: From Risk Scores to Imaging.

R I Med J (2013)

February 2025

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence RI.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This review explores the evolving evidence base surrounding ASCVD prevention, particularly regarding nontraditional biomarkers, risk scores, and cardiovascular imaging modalities. Additionally, this review examines cardiovascular risk scores, including the PREVENT and MESA-CHD scores, which incorporate both traditional and nontraditional factors, thereby aspiring to offer a more equitable and precise risk assessment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!