Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyab324 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Predictive signatures of immune response to vaccination and implications of the immune setpoint remodeling.
mSphere
January 2025
Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
In 2020, I featured two articles in the "mSphere of Influence" commentary series that had profound implications for the field of immunology and helped shape my research perspective. These articles were "Global Analyses of Human Immune Variation Reveal Baseline Predictors of Postvaccination Responses" by Tsang et al. (Cell 157:499-513, 2014, https://doi.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Future of Generative AI in Continuing Professional Development (CPD): Crowdsourcing the Alliance Community.
J CME
December 2024
Independent Consultant, San Francisco, USA.
More than a decade ago, Dr. Curtis Olson published a futuristic commentary predicting the next era of Continuing Professional Development (CPD). While Dr.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFostering citizen-engaged HIV implementation science.
J Int AIDS Soc
July 2024
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Article Synopsis
- Successful implementation of HIV treatments depends on understanding the needs of communities and getting them involved in the process.
- Citizen engagement is important for making sure that everyone’s voices are heard when figuring out how to fight HIV, especially in less represented populations.
- By involving citizens in asking questions and developing solutions, we can make HIV response efforts more effective and fair for everyone.
The Burden for High-Quality Online Data Collection Lies With Researchers, Not Recruitment Platforms.
Perspect Psychol Sci
November 2024
Cognition, Values and Behavior, LMU Munich.
Article Synopsis
- A study showed that only 2.6% of people from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) were considered valid participants, which some researchers think is misleading.
- The article argues that the way the study was done led to low-quality results and points out that MTurk can still be useful if used correctly.
- It emphasizes that researchers need to know how to use MTurk effectively and that the quality of data collected is the researcher's responsibility, not just the platform.
Too Anecdotal to Be True? Mechanical Turk Is Not All Bots and Bad Data: Response to Webb and Tangney (2022).
Perspect Psychol Sci
November 2024
Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, School of Business, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Article Synopsis
- Some researchers said that data from Amazon's MTurk was not very good, claiming it was only 2.6% valid.
- We think they made some mistakes in how they designed their study and collected information, which made their results not so strong.
- In our response, we share tips on how to get better and more reliable data from online surveys.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!