The prevailing formalisms for isolating individual polarization effects from the experimental Mueller matrix can be broadly divided into two categories; decomposition of to derive the individual optical effects and directly associating the individual optical effects to specific elements of (i.e., non-decomposition techniques). Mueller matrix transformation (MMT) and direct interpretation of Mueller matrix (DIMM) are two popular techniques of the latter category. In this study, these two non-decomposition techniques (i.e., MMT and DIMM) are compared in a detailed quantitative analysis comprising of tissues (n = 53) and phantom (n = 45) samples. In particular, two commonly investigated polarimetric variables (i.e., depolarization and retardance) were calculated from the experimentally measured using both the non-decomposition (i.e., MMT and DIMM) techniques. The comparison carried out with scatter plots (integrated with the correlation coefficients), violin plots and Bland and Altman plots revealed better agreement of depolarization-related variables (as compared to the retardance) between the two non-decomposition techniques. The comparative analyses presented here would be beneficial for the interpretation of polarimetric variables and optical characterization of turbid media.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367253PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.426637DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mueller matrix
16
non-decomposition techniques
16
isolating individual
8
individual polarization
8
polarization effects
8
individual optical
8
optical effects
8
mmt dimm
8
polarimetric variables
8
techniques
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!