Objective: The present study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of the Luteinizing hormone (LH) levels and single 60-minute post gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist stimulation test for idiopathic central precocious puberty (CPP) in girls.

Methods: Data from 1,492 girls diagnosed with precocious puberty who underwent GnRH agonist stimulation testing between January 1, 2016, and October 8, 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. LH levels and LH/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ratios were measured by immuno-chemiluminescence assay before and at several timepoints after GnRH analogue stimulation testing. Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's correlation, χ test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic utility of these hormone levels.

Results: The 1,492 subjects were split into two groups: an idiopathic CPP group ( = 518) and a non-CPP group ( = 974). Basal LH levels and LH/FSH ratios were significantly different between the two groups at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after GnRH analogue stimulation testing. Spearman's correlation analysis showed the strongest correlation between peak LH and LH levels at 60 minutes after GnRH agonist stimulation ( = 0.986,  < 0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed that the 60-minute LH/FSH ratio yielded the highest consistency, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.988 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.982-0.993) and a cut-off point of 0.603 mIU/L (sensitivity 97.3%, specificity 93.0%). The cut-off points of basal LH and LH/FSH were 0.255 mIU/L (sensitivity 68.9%, specificity 86.0%) and 0.07 (sensitivity 73.2%, specificity 89.5%), respectively, with AUCs of 0.823 (95% CI, 0.799-0.847) and 0.843 (95% CI, 0.819-0.867), respectively.

Conclusions: A basal LH value greater than 0.535 mIU/L can be used to diagnose CPP without a GnRH agonist stimulation test. A single 60-minute post-stimulus gonadotropin result of LH and LH/FSH can be used instead of a GnRH agonist stimulation test, or samples can be taken only at 0, 30, and 60 minutes after a GnRH agonist stimulation test. This reduces the number of blood draws required compared with the traditional stimulation test, while still achieving a high level of diagnostic accuracy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387794PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.713880DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gnrh agonist
28
agonist stimulation
28
stimulation test
24
diagnostic utility
12
single 60-minute
12
precocious puberty
12
stimulation testing
12
minutes gnrh
12
stimulation
10
gnrh
9

Similar Publications

Background: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol is associated with few oocytes retrieved, few mature oocytes and poor endometrial receptivity. Omission of GnRH-ants on trigger day seems unlikely to induce preovulation and may improve outcomes in the GnRH-ant protocol. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of GnRH-ant cessation on trigger day on in vitro fertilisation outcomes following the GnRH-ant protocol.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hormone therapy enhances anti-PD1 efficacy in premenopausal estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Cell Rep Med

December 2024

Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei City 106, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City 100, Taiwan; Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City 100, Taiwan. Electronic address:

The efficacy of immunotherapy for estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative (ER+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has not been proven. We conduct a phase 1b/2 trial to assess the efficacy of combining pembrolizumab (anti-PD1 antibody), exemestane (nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor), and leuprolide (gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist) for 15 patients with premenopausal ER+/HER2- MBC who had failed one to two lines of hormone therapy (HT) without chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival rate at 8 months (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: No conceptually new drugs for the safe and successful cure of endometriosis are likely to become available soon. Hormonal modulation of ovarian function and suppression of menstruation remain the pillars of disease control. However, existing drugs may be used following novel modalities to limit the consequences of endometriosis progression.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) are gynecological conditions affecting women of reproductive age and causing pain symptoms. The symptoms caused by these conditions are similar; thus, the differential diagnosis may be challenging. The treatment of these conditions is very different because PID is treated with antibiotic therapy, while endometriosis is treated with hormonal therapies suppressing estrogen levels.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in men worldwide. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor (LHRH-R) agonists and antagonists are known to achieve castration-level testosterone suppression; however, long-term data comparing the survival benefits of these therapies are insufficient to inform treatment decisions. Furthermore, the advent of next-generation hormonal agents (NHAs), such as abiraterone and enzalutamide, have shifted the paradigm of managing prostate cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!