AI Article Synopsis

  • Objectives focused on creating standardized methods for measuring upper limb strength and grip/pinch force in tetraplegic patients undergoing reconstructive surgery.
  • An expert panel reviewed current measurement practices, identified inconsistencies, and utilized electronic voting among participants to achieve consensus on assessment protocols, aiming for at least 75% agreement.
  • Key findings included the adoption of the Medical Research Council scale for manual muscle testing, specific recommendations for grip and pinch strength testing, but lack of agreement on a pinch strength device; this work aims to improve comparability of data for future therapies and studies.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To reach agreement on standardized protocols for assessing upper limb strength and grip and pinch force for upper limb reconstructive surgery for tetraplegia.

Methods: Selected members of an expert panel composed of international therapists formed at the 2018 International Congress for Upper Limb Surgery for Tetraplegia conducted a literature review of current practice that identified gaps and inconsistencies in measurement protocols and presented to workshop attendees. To resolve discrepancies, a set of questions was presented to workshop attendees who voted electronically. Consensus was set at 75% agreement.

Results: For manual muscle testing, consensus was reached for using the Medical Research Council scale, without plus or minus, and the use of resistance through range when testing grade 4 and grade 5 strength. Pectoralis major and serratus anterior should be routinely tested, however there was no consensus on other shoulder muscles. Grip and pinch strength should be tested according to the American Society of Hand Therapists positioning. For grip strength, either the Jamar or Biometrics dynamometer expressed in kilograms should be used. For grip and pinch strength, three measurements should be performed at each testing. No consensus was reached on a device for pinch strength.

Conclusion: This work is an important step to enable comparable data in the future. Further consensus methods will work toward developing more comprehensive guidelines in this population. Building international consensus for pre- and postoperative measures of function supports objective evaluation of novel therapies and interpretation of multicenter studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370705PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.46292/sci20-00012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upper limb
20
grip pinch
12
assessing upper
8
grip strength
8
presented workshop
8
workshop attendees
8
testing consensus
8
consensus reached
8
pinch strength
8
consensus
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!