Purpose: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with hypercoagulability and increased thrombotic risk. The impact of prehospital antiplatelet therapy on in-hospital mortality is uncertain.
Methods: This was an observational cohort study of 34 675 patients ≥50 years old from 90 health systems in the United States. Patients were hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 between February 2020 and September 2020. For all patients, the propensity to receive prehospital antiplatelet therapy was calculated using demographics and comorbidities. Patients were matched based on propensity scores, and in-hospital mortality was compared between the antiplatelet and non-antiplatelet groups.
Results: The propensity score-matched cohort of 17 347 patients comprised of 6781 and 10 566 patients in the antiplatelet and non-antiplatelet therapy groups, respectively. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients receiving prehospital antiplatelet therapy (18.9% vs. 21.5%, p < .001), resulting in a 2.6% absolute reduction in mortality (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.87, p < .005). On average, 39 patients needed to be treated to prevent one in-hospital death. In the antiplatelet therapy group, there was a significantly lower rate of pulmonary embolism (2.2% vs. 3.0%, p = .002) and higher rate of epistaxis (0.9% vs. 0.4%, p < .001). There was no difference in the rate of other hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications.
Conclusions: In the largest observational study to date of prehospital antiplatelet therapy in patients with COVID-19, there was an association with significantly lower in-hospital mortality. Randomized controlled trials in diverse patient populations with high rates of baseline comorbidities are needed to determine the ultimate utility of antiplatelet therapy in COVID-19.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646433 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jth.15517 | DOI Listing |
BMC Emerg Med
October 2024
Pôle Médecine d'Urgence - Place du Dr Joseph Baylac, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, 31300, France.
Biomedicines
September 2024
Perfuse Study Group, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Acute myocardial infarction still represents the major cause of mortality in high-income countries. Therefore, considerable efforts have been focused on the treatment of myocardial infarctions in the acute and long-term phase, with special attention being paid to reperfusion strategies and adjunctive antithrombotic therapies. In fact, despite the successful mechanical recanalization of the epicardial conduit, a substantial percentage of patients still experience poor myocardial reperfusion or acute/subacute in-stent thrombosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care
August 2024
Department of Medicine, Cardiac Sciences, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute and University of Alberta, 2C2 Cardiology, WMC, 8440 112 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G2B7.
Cardiol Rev
June 2024
From the Department of Medicine, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY.
Zalunfiban is a novel glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor currently being tested for its use in the prehospital setting for antiplatelet effect in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. It has shown to be safe and effective in both phase 1 and phase 2 trials and is under investigation in phase 3 trials. In this review, we discuss zalunfiban in detail, including its mechanism of action, adverse effects, current recommendations for use, and ongoing trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFScand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
June 2024
Research & Development, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Brendstrupgårdsvej 7, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a potential high-risk condition, but appropriate care pathways, including prehospital triage and primary referral to a specialised neurosurgical centre, can improve neurological outcome and survival. The care pathway starts with layman triage, wherein the patient or bystander decides whether to contact a general practitioner (GP) or emergency services (1-1-2 call) as an entryway into the health care system. The GP or 112-health care professional then decides on the level of urgency and dispatches emergency medical services (EMS) when needed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!