Introduction: Conversion from low-grade to high-grade disease is known to occur following repeat cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC); however, the incidence rate, risk factors, and outcomes have not been studied.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of multiple CRS/HIPEC cases for patients originally diagnosed with low-grade appendiceal neoplasms, and compared converted cases with non-converters. Primary outcomes were the incidence rate and risk factors for conversion, while secondary outcomes were effect on cytoreduction, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results: Overall, 65 patients undergoing 134 cases of repeat CRS/HIPEC were identified; 11 patients converted to high-grade disease, an incidence rate of 16.92%. Converted cases averaged 4.4 years between CRS/HIPEC, versus 3.7 years for non-converters. Elevated baseline carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, splenectomy at index CRS/HIPEC, and adjuvant chemotherapy utilization were statistically significant with conversion. Conversion had no impact on specific cytoreductive scores at repeat CRS/HIPEC (p = 0.435). Evaluating the effect on OS from the index CRS/HIPEC conversion had no impact. Mean OS was 9.5 and 8.8 years for cases that remained low-grade compared with those that converted, respectively (p = 0.668); however, when comparing OS from the time of conversion at repeat CRS/HIPEC, patients who progressed to high-grade disease had decreased survival at 4.4 versus 5.8 years (p = 0.0317). There was no difference in DFS between non-converters and converters at 4.1 and 3.6 years, respectively (p = 0.671).

Conclusion: Conversion had no impact on OS from the index CRS/HIPEC but resulted in inferior survival from repeat surgery. Conversion was insignificant in regard to DFS, and should not be considered a contraindication to repeat CRS/HIPEC. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be avoided.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10660-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

repeat crs/hipec
16
risk factors
12
high-grade disease
12
incidence rate
12
conversion impact
12
crs/hipec
10
conversion
9
factors outcomes
8
conversion low-grade
8
low-grade high-grade
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Standard treatment for resectable peritoneal metastases (PM) involves cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), but recurrence rates are high, prompting consideration for repeat procedures in some patients.
  • A study analyzed 132 repeat CRS/HIPEC surgeries between 1994 and 2024, finding that most patients had multiple procedures with similar complications and recovery times, and no 90-day postoperative mortality was recorded.
  • Results indicated that while overall survival and recurrence-free survival varied, the procedure offers comparable outcomes for both initial and repeat surgeries, with improved survival observed, particularly for patients with peritoneal pseudomyxoma (
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Secondary treatment of recurrent colorectal peritoneal metastases after previous cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is poorly investigated.

Objectives: To evaluate the overall survival outcome of secondary (repeat) CRS + HIPEC compared to palliative treatment in recurrent peritoneal disease.

Methods: Patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases treated with an index CRS + HIPEC and subsequently having recurrent peritoneal disease were identified from the prospective Swedish national HIPEC registry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Many patients with mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma experience peritoneal recurrence despite complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Prior work has demonstrated that repeat CRS/HIPEC can prolong survival in select patients. We sought to validate these findings using outcomes from a high-volume center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A common practice is to switch chemotherapy perfusion agents for repeat cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). However, there is a paucity of objective benefit with this practice.

Methods: A retrospective review of our institutional registry involving repeat CRS-HIPEC cases was conducted, comparing cases that underwent a perfusion agent switch versus those cases with no switch.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!