Purpose: The purpose was to evaluate the difference in crestal bone loss (CBL) around implants with flap and flapless methods followed by early loading.

Materials And Methods: Twenty implants were placed in twenty patients - ten using flap and ten using flapless techniques. The difference in CBL was measured on standardized digital periapical radiograph taken at 0 week, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months.

Results: The present study showed the mean CBL on proximal surfaces when evaluated at intervals of 0 week, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months for flapless method was significantly lower than with flap method the values of which were +0.07 mm against +0.26 mm on mesial side and +0.15 mm against +0.33 mm on distal side at 6 months.

Conclusion: The flapless approach is a predictable procedure when patient selection and surgical technique are appropriate, and results in lesser CBL.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375825PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_580_20DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

crestal bone
8
week weeks
8
weeks weeks
8
comparison crestal
4
bone heights
4
heights implant
4
implant placement
4
placement "flapless"
4
"flapless" "flap"
4
"flap" techniques
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!