P1 Stanghellini, Mohammadi, Förster, and Adaskaveg is an oomycete root pathogen that has recently been characterized. It only attacks plant species belonging to family, causing root necrosis, stunting, and yield loss. Since P1 is limited in its host range, this prompted us to sequence its whole genome and compare it to those of broad host range spp. such as and var. . A genomic DNA library was constructed with a total of 374 million reads. The sequencing data were assembled using SOAPdenovo2, yielding a total genome size of 50.3 Mb contained in 5434 scaffolds, N50 of 30.2 Kb, 61.2% G+C content, and 13,232 putative protein-coding genes. P1 had 175 species-specific gene families, which is slightly below the normal average. Like , P1 genome did not encode any classical RxLR effectors or cutinases, suggesting a significant difference in virulence mechanisms compared to other oomycetes. P1 had a much smaller proportions of the YxSL sequence motif in both secreted and non-secreted proteins, relative to other species. Similarly, P1 had the fewest (CRN) effectors of all the species. There were 633 proteins predicted to be secreted in the P1 genome, which is, again, slightly below average among genomes. P1 had only one cadherin gene with calcium ion-binding LDRE and DxND motifs, compared to having four copies. P1 had a reduced number of proteins falling under carbohydrate binding module and hydrolytic enzymes. P1 had a reduced complement of cellulase and pectinase genes in contrast to and was deficient in xylan degrading enzymes. The contraction in ABC transporter families in P1 is suggested to be the result of a lack of diversity in nutrient uptake and therefore host range.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8396444PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22169002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

host range
12
oomycete root
8
root pathogen
8
genome
5
insights host
4
host specificity
4
specificity oomycete
4
pathogen genome
4
genome sequencing
4
sequencing comparative
4

Similar Publications

Pest categorisation of .

EFSA J

January 2025

Following the commodity risk assessment of plants grafted on from China, in which (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) was identified as a pest of possible concern, the European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to conduct a pest categorisation of for the territory of the European Union (EU). The origin of the scale insect is uncertain, with either South America or eastern Asia suggested as the native range. The geographic distribution of the species includes many countries of the continents of Africa, North and South America, Asia and Oceania.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

infection is diagnosed by parasitological, molecular, and serological tests. Molecular methods based on DNA amplification provide a more sensitive alternative to classical parasitological techniques for detecting evidence of parasitemia, and are the preferred tests for congenital and oral transmission cases and parasite reactivation in chronically infected immunosuppressed individuals. In newborns at risk of vertical transmission, simplified diagnostic algorithms that provide timely results can reduce the high follow-up losses observed with current algorithms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

With climate and land use changes, tick-borne pathogens are expected to become more widely distributed in Canada. Pathogen spread and transmission in this region is modulated by changes in the abundance and distribution of tick and host populations. Here, we assessed the relationships between pathogens detected in and mammal hosts at sites of different levels of disease risk using data from summer field surveys in Ontario and Quebec, Canada.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease PLpro has multiple roles in the viral replication cycle, related to both its polypeptide cleavage function and its ability to antagonize the host immune response. Targeting the PLpro function is recognized as a promising mechanism to modulate viral replication, while supporting host immune responses. However, the development of PLpro-specific inhibitors remains challenging.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Does a biological invasion modify host immune responses to parasite infection?

R Soc Open Sci

January 2025

Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Biological invasions can disrupt the close and longstanding coevolved relationships between host and parasites. At the same time, the shifting selective forces acting on demography during invasion can result in rapid evolution of traits in both host and parasite. Hosts at the invasion front may reduce investment into costly immune defences and redistribute those resources to other fitness-enhancing traits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!