Background: The nuclear or radiation disaster risk within the French Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes state is low (but not absent) due to its proximity to four Nuclear Power Generation Centers and two regional cancer control centers. This study aims to compare subjective stress ratings for emergency health care workers regarding nuclear and radiation disasters between two locations: at work versus at home.

Materials And Methods: We distributed an anonymous online questionnaire via RedCap to all emergency health care workers who could be involved in patient care after a nuclear or radiation disaster. It comprised 18 questions divided into three parts-theoretical knowledge and practical assessment, stress assessment, and sociodemographic criteria.

Results: We analyzed 107 responses. There was a significant 11-point increase in stress levels between work and home regarding nuclear or radiation disaster risks ( = 0.01). Less than 25% of emergency health care workers surveyed benefited from annual training.

Conclusion: The stress levels of emergency health care workers regarding nuclear or radiation disaster were higher at work than at home and increased without annual training. It is important to increase knowledge about these protocols and to mandate yearly training for all workers potentially involved in these disasters.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393601PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168384DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nuclear radiation
24
emergency health
20
health care
20
care workers
20
radiation disaster
20
workers nuclear
12
workers involved
8
stress levels
8
nuclear
7
care
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!