Introduction: Advance care planning is recommended in chronic respiratory diseases, including Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. In practice, uptake remains low due to patient, physician and system-related factors, including lack of time, training and guidance on timing, components and content of conversations. Our aim was to explore perspectives, experiences and needs to inform a framework.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative study in western Canada, using semi-structured interviews and inductive analysis. Patient, caregiver and health care professional participants described advance care planning experiences with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Results: Twenty participants were interviewed individually: 5 patients, 5 caregivers, 5 home care and 5 acute care health care professionals. Two categories, perceptions and recommendations, were identified with themes and subthemes. Participant perceptions were insufficient information and conversations occur late. Recommendations were: have earlier conversations; have open conversations; provide detailed information; and plan for end-of-life. Patients and caregivers wanted honesty, openness and clarity. Professionals related delayed timing to poor end-of-life care and distressing deaths. Home care professionals described comfort with and an engaged approach to advance care planning. Acute care professionals perceived lack of clarity of roles and described personal, patient and caregiver distress.
Interpretation: Analysis of diverse experiences provided further understanding of advance care planning in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Advance care planning is desired by patients and caregivers early in their illness experience. Health care professionals described a need to clarify role, scope and responsibility. Practical guidance and training must be available to care providers to improve competency and confidence in these conversations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9082969 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10499091211041724 | DOI Listing |
BMC Glob Public Health
January 2025
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Downtown Phoenix Campus, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
J Cardiothorac Surg
January 2025
School of Medicine, American University of the Caribbean, Cupecoy, Sint Maarten.
Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery (MINS) is an increasingly recognized complication that significantly impacts postoperative morbidity and mortality. Characterized by elevated cardiac troponin levels without overt ischemic symptoms, MINS presents a challenge in perioperative care. This review article explores the epidemiology, etiology, and management of MINS, with a particular focus on prevention and the latest management strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMol Neurodegener
January 2025
Aligning Science Across Parkinson's (ASAP) Collaborative Research Network, Chevy Chase, MD, 20815, USA.
Gastrointestinal (GI) involvement in Lewy body diseases (LBDs) has been observed since the initial descriptions of patients by James Parkinson. Recent experimental and human observational studies raise the possibility that pathogenic alpha-synuclein (⍺-syn) might develop in the GI tract and subsequently spread to susceptible brain regions. The cellular and mechanistic origins of ⍺-syn propagation in disease are under intense investigation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Nurs
January 2025
China Rehabilitation Research Center, No.18 Jiaomen North Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, China.
Background: Nursing prescribing rights have been proposed in many countries, with physicians' attitudes playing an important role. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes of physicians toward nurse prescribing rights.
Methods: A cross-sectional study of 112 Chinese physicians was conducted from January to March 2024.
BMC Cancer
January 2025
Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Background: Integrating germline genetic testing (GGT) recommendations from tumor testing into hereditary cancer clinics and precision oncology trials presents challenges that require multidisciplinary expertise and infrastructure. While there have been advancements in standardizing molecular tumor boards, the implementation of tumor profiling for germline-focused assessments has only recently gained momentum. However, this progress remains inconsistent across institutions, largely owing to a lack of systematic approaches for managing these findings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!