Tear Lysozyme in Sjögren´s syndrome, Meibomian gland dysfunction, and non-dry-eye.

Arq Bras Oftalmol

Laboratorio Traslacional de Inmunopatologia & Oftalmologia, Departamento de Patologia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Published: April 2022

Purpose: To evaluate the concentration of tear lysozyme in individuals with Sjogren´s syndrome, meibomian gland dysfunction, and non-dry-eye disease.

Methods: Ninety subjects were recruited for this study, including 30 with Sjogren´s syndrome, 30 with meibomian gland dysfunction, and 30 with non-dry-eye disease. All subjects were referred to participate in the study based on a "dry eye" investigation. They underwent a complete ocular surface ophthalmic examination encompassing ocular surface disease index, biomicroscopy, tear break-up time, Schirmer test type I, conjunctival vital staining with fluorescein and lissamine green, tear lysozyme concentration, and impression cytology.

Results: Clinical tests yielded the following results: ocular surface disease index Sjogren´s syndrome: 64.5 ± 22.6 meibomian gland dysfunction: 43.5 ± 21.4, non-dry-eye disease: 6.7 ± 4.3 (p=0.02 between groups); Schirmer I test (mm/5 min): Sjogren´s syndrome: 4.95 ± 2.25, meibomian gland dysfunction: 13.28 ± 1.53, non-dry-eye disease 13.70 ± 1.39 (p<0.01 Sjogren´s syndrome vs. non-dry-eye disease and p<0.01 meibomian gland dysfunction vs. non-dry-eye disease); tear break-up time (seconds): Sjogren´s syndrome: 3.97 ± 1.47, meibomian gland dysfunction: 3.95 ± 0.86, non-dry-eye disease: 7.25 ± 1.90 (p<0.01 Sjogren´s syndrome vs. non-dry-eye disease and p<0.01 meibomian gland dysfunction vs. non-dry-eye disease); Lissamine green score: Sjogren´s syndrome-dry-eye: 6.18 ± 2.14, meibomian gland dysfunction-dry-eye: 5.27 ± 1.27, non-dry-eye disease: 1.52 ± 0.97 (p<0.01 Sjogren´s syndrome vs. non-dry-eye disease and p<0.01 meibomian gland dysfunction vs. non-dry-eye disease); impression cytology score: Sjogren´s syndrome: 1.88 ± 0.92, meibomian gland dysfunction: 1.67 ± 0.56, non-dry-eye: 0.45 ± 0.44 (p<0.01 Sjogren´s syndrome vs. non-dry-eye disease and p<0.01 meibomian gland dysfunction vs. non-dry-eye disease) and; tear lysozyme concentration (µg/mL): Sjogren´s syndrome: 751.25 ± 244.73, meibomian gland dysfunction: 1423.67 ± 182.75, non-dry-eye disease: 1409.90 ± 188.21 (p<0.01 Sjogren´s syndrome vs. non-dry-eye disease and p<0.01 Sjogren´s syndrome vs. meibomian gland dysfunction).

Conclusion: The concentration of lysozyme in the tears was lower in Sjögren's syndrome patients than in meibomian gland dysfunction and non-dry-eye disease groups. Hence, the lacrimal lysozyme could be considered as a simple, non-invasive, and economical biomarker to differentiate between Sjögren's syndrome dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction dry eye disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20220017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

meibomian gland
20
gland dysfunction
20
sjogren´s syndrome
16
tear lysozyme
12
syndrome meibomian
12
dysfunction non-dry-eye
12
non-dry-eye disease
12
ocular surface
12
surface disease
8
schirmer test
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light (IPL) combined with meibomian gland expression (MGX) for the treatment of dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction associated with chronic Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Methods: This prospective noncomparative interventional study included 29 patients (58 eyes) who underwent 3 sessions of IPL and MGX at 2-week intervals. Subjective symptoms (ocular surface disease index score) and objective dry eye tests: matrix metalloproteinase 9, tear meniscus height, bulbar redness score, tear film lipid layer thickness (LLT), Schirmer I test, conjunctival and corneal staining, meibomian gland loss, MGX score [meibomian gland score (MGS)], and tear break-up time were assessed at the baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare the meibographies and dry eye parameters of paretic vs non-paretic sides of patients with a facial palsy diagnosis.

Patients And Methods: Twenty patients with unilateral facial palsy were recruited and the severity of the disease was staged using the House-Brackmann scale. A comprehensive dry eye evaluation was performed using the Oculus 5M Keratograph.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a primary cause of evaporative dry eye disease (DED), which is often exacerbated by cataract surgery due to surgical trauma and inflammation. Thermal pulsation therapy (TPT) aims to enhance meibomian gland function and relieve dry eye symptoms. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of TPT in managing dry eye symptoms associated with cataract surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Blink completeness and rate in dry eye disease: An investigator-masked, prospective registry-based, cross-sectional, prognostic study.

Cont Lens Anterior Eye

January 2025

Department of Ophthalmology, Aotearoa New Zealand National Eye Centre, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address:

Purpose: To investigate the prognostic ability of blink rate and the proportion of incomplete blinking to predict dry eye disease diagnosis, as defined by the TFOS DEWS II criteria.

Methods: A total of 453 community residents (282 females, 171 males; mean ± SD age, 37 ± 19 years) were recruited in an investigator-masked, prospective registry-based, cross-sectional, prognostic study. Dry eye symptomology, tear film quality, and ocular surface characteristics were assessed in a single clinical session, and blink parameters evaluated by an independent masked observer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light (IPL) treatments using a 590-nm and an acne filter. In this prospective, randomized, paired-eye trial study, 30 patients with moderate and severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) were followed up for at least one month after their last treatment. Group A received IPL treatment with an acne filter, a type of notch filter that blocks wavelengths between 600 and 800 nm, allowing IPL to emit wavelengths between 400-600 nm and 800-1200 nm.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!