Pegfilgrastim Biosimilars: Where Are We Now?

J Adv Pract Oncol

St. Joseph Health, Irvine, California.

Published: July 2021

In 1991, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved rmetHuGCSF for human use. This recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or filgrastim, saw use in over 1 million patients in its first 5 years on the market. In 2002, the FDA approved a version of filgrastim with covalent linkage to a monomethoxypolyethylene glycol, increasing the molecular size and half-life to replace multiple days of dosing with a single injection. These medications remained standard of care for neutropenia until the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 created an abbreviated pathway to licensure for biologic products. Practitioners now have their pick of numerous and expanding options for pegfilgrastim biosimilars.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8299796PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2021.12.5.9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pegfilgrastim biosimilars
8
fda approved
8
biosimilars now?
4
now? 1991
4
1991 food
4
food drug
4
drug administration
4
administration fda
4
approved rmethugcsf
4
rmethugcsf human
4

Similar Publications

PEGylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (pegfilgrastim) is used clinically to reduce the incidence and duration of severe neutropenia in patients who have received chemotherapy treatment. Pegfilgrastim products are administered by subcutaneous injection. We herein report that solutions of pegfilgrastim originator product Neulasta®, of a biosimilar product candidate, and also of the pegfilgrastim originator formulation buffer, induced aggregate formation when mixed in vitro with human plasma, and formation of large membranous aggregated structures when mixed with human blood.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Pegfilgrastim is a long-acting recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor biologic that is indicated to reduce the incidence of infections, manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients receiving myelosuppressive anti-cancer drugs and to increase survival in patients acutely exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation. Due to the high cost of biologic therapy and the scarcity of biosimilar alternatives, there is an unmet medical need for targeted biologics.

Objective: This comparative analytical investigation aimed to confirm the similarity of biosimilar Stimufend® (pegfilgrastim-fpgk) to reference product Neulasta® (pegfilgrastim).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mecapegfilgrastim for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in children and adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma: a prospective, single-arm, pilot study.

BMC Cancer

August 2024

Hematology CenterNational Center for Children's HealthKey Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 56 Nanlishi Road, Beijing, 100045, China.

Background: The chemotherapy regimens recommended for both rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and Ewing sarcoma (ES) patients are myelosuppressive and can reduce the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and subsequently increase the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). However, only a few studies have focused on the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) drugs in pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS and ES. Our objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim, a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim, in prophylaxis of FN for pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Biosimilar underutilization alone does not foretell a broken biologics market.

Health Aff Sch

July 2024

Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States.

Biosimilars offer the potential for cost savings and expanded access to biologic products; however, there are concerns regarding the rate of biosimilar uptake. We assessed the relationship between biosimilar and originator pricing, coverage, and market share by describing four case studies that fall into two categories: (1) sole preferred coverage strategy (ie, aim is to have originator product preferred; biosimilar(s) non-preferred), defined as steep average sales price (ASP) reductions for originator products (decline in net prices by at least 50% following the introduction of biosimilar competition by 2022) and (2) non-sole preferred coverage strategy (ie, aim is to have originator product preferred alongside biosimilar products), defined as moderate ASP reductions for originator products with (net prices did not decline by at least 50% of its pre-biosimilar competition value). We found that originators with sole preferred coverage strategies maintained formulary preference and market share relative to originators with non-sole preferred coverage strategies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to analyze the types and amounts of quality information requested by the FDA and EMA for biosimilar applications, focusing on Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control data.
  • Analysis of queries from seven biosimilars revealed that the majority targeted drug substance manufacture, control, and product development, with notable differences in query proportions between the two regulatory authorities.
  • Findings emphasize the importance of manufacturing and control topics, highlighting the need for robust scientific and technical content to meet regulatory expectations for biosimilar approvals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!