This secondary analysis examined the impact of respondent-level factors on scores on the Supports Intensity Scale-Adult Version (SIS-A) to determine if there were patterns of differences in SIS-A scores based on the number of respondents and the pairings of respondents that were included in SIS-A interviews. Results indicated that having fewer respondents led to a greater variability in SIS-A scores whereas having more respondents led to higher mean, overall support need scores. When respondents included an adult with intellectual disability (ID) the mean score was significantly lower. However, there were complex influences of pairing an adult with ID with either a professional or family member on SIS-A scores. Implications for administering and using the SIS-A are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-126.5.361DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sis-a scores
12
pairings respondents
8
scores supports
8
supports intensity
8
intensity scale-adult
8
scale-adult version
8
version sis-a
8
respondents included
8
respondents led
8
scores respondents
8

Similar Publications

Long-term analysis of infections and associated risk factors in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab: pooled analysis of 13 interventional clinical trials.

Ther Adv Neurol Disord

October 2024

Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • - Patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) face a higher risk of infections, especially those treated with ocrelizumab (OCR), as shown in a study involving 6,155 patients over a median period of 3.7 years.
  • - Serious infections (SIs) were reported at an incidence rate of 1.50 per 100 patient years for relapsing MS and 3.70 for progressive MS, with lower respiratory, urinary, abdominal, gastrointestinal, and skin infections being the most common.
  • - Significant risk factors for SIs included comorbidities, recent relapses, and higher disability scores, particularly in patients with progressive MS where a high EDSS score indicated a fourfold increase in
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The systemic inflammatory score (SIS), a new inflammatory marker based on a combination of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and serum albumin concentration, has been reported to be a useful prognostic marker for several malignancies. The authors conducted this retrospective study on data from a cohort of esophageal cancer patients undergoing potentially curative resection to clarify the value of SIS as a prognostic marker for clinical outcome in this population.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 32 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer between January 2016 and December 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Many U.S. states use the Supports Intensity Scale-Adult Version (SIS-A) to determine funding for long-term services and supports.
  • During the COVID-19 pandemic, states switched to virtual SIS-A assessments, raising concerns about how this change might affect scores and funding.
  • The study found that while the method of assessment (in-person vs. virtual) did influence SIS-A scores, the overall impact was found to be minimal and not practically significant.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Development of a Short-Form Stroke Impact Scale Using a Machine Learning Algorithm for Patients at the Subacute Stage.

Am J Occup Ther

November 2022

Ching-Lin Hsieh, PhD, is Professor, School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Adjunct Occupational Therapist, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Adjunct Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan;

Importance: Several short forms of the Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 (SIS 3.0) have been proposed in order to decrease its administration time of about 20 min.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: We examined the unidimensionality and Rasch reliability of both Jenkinson's and MacIsaac's eight-item short versions of the Stroke Impact Scale (SF-SIS), a questionnaire for assessing overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Methods: This study was a secondary data analysis in which 263 persons with stroke completed the SIS. The 263 persons, on average, had age of 60 years, mild stroke, and moderate disability of self-care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!