Generating direct comparative evidence in prospective randomized trials is difficult for rare diseases. Real-world cohorts may supplement control populations. Entrectinib-treated adults with advanced fusion-positive NSCLC (n = 94) from Phase I/II trials (ALKA-372-001 [EudraCT2012-00148-88], STARTRK-1 [NCT02097810], and STARTRK-2 [NCT02568267]) were compared with a real-world crizotinib-treated cohort (n = 65). Primary end point, time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD); secondary end points, PFS and OS. Median (95% CI) weighted TTD: 12.9 (9.9-17.4) months for entrectinib; 8.8 (6.2-9.9) months for crizotinib (weighted hazard ratio: 0.72 [0.51-1.02]). Median OS with entrectinib was not reached, weighted median OS with crizotinib was 18.5 (15.1-19.9) months. Entrectinib administered in clinical trials may be associated with longer TTD than a real-world crizotinib population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/cer-2021-0131DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

months entrectinib
8
comparative effectiveness
4
effectiveness analysis
4
entrectinib
4
analysis entrectinib
4
entrectinib clinical
4
clinical trial
4
crizotinib
4
trial crizotinib
4
real-world
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!