Objective: The SARS-COV2 pandemic led to massive disruptions of care for orthopedic patients. Although many elective procedures were put on hold, a cohort of patients who underwent surgery prior to the outbreak of the pandemic were rendered unable to participate in standard post-operative care. The purpose of this study was to determine the methods of post-operative care in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients who received care during an early height of the pandemic to those who received standard of care in the prior year. We aimed to correlate those results with 1-year clinical outcomes in the form of subjective surveys.
Methods: Retrospective chart review was used to identify patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in February and March of 2020 (case) and 2019 (control) at a single institution. Workman's compensation patients were excluded. Identified patients were asked to report post-operative care received, satisfaction with care, and complete the IKDC and Lysholm outcome measures. Surveys were conducted minimum 1-year post-operative.
Results: 236 patients were identified, including 103 in 2020 and 133 in 2019. Follow-up data was collected for 73 patients (70.9%) in 2020 and 97 patients (72.9%) in 2019. Fifty-one COVID cohort patients (69.9%) had at least one clinical visit conducted via telehealth, compared to zero in the control. There were no differences in IKDC (82.8 ± 13.2 vs 85.0 ± 12.0, P = 0.29) and Lysholm (89.2 ± 11.3 vs 89.6 ± 10.8, P = 0.82) between groups. There were no differences in patient satisfaction with the care received (82.9 ± 22.4 vs 81.9 ± 21.8, P = 0.79).
Conclusion: Despite disruptions in care, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients have excellent 1-year outcomes during the pandemic. Telehealth follow-up appointments may be appropriate for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients beyond the pandemic and do not seem to adversely affect short-term patient reported outcome measures.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2021.1971494 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Deep Learning Superresolution for Simultaneous Multislice Parallel Imaging-Accelerated Knee MRI Using Arthroscopy Validation.
Radiology
January 2025
From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 660 1st Ave, 3rd Fl, Rm 313, New York, NY 10016 (S.S.W., J.V., R.K., E.H.P., J.F.); Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (S.S.W.); Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland (J.V.); Department of Radiology, Hospital do Coraçao, São Paulo, Brazil (T.C.R.); Academic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre (SWLEOC), London, United Kingdom (D.D.); Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland (B.F.); Department of Radiology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (E.H.P.); Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (E.H.P.); Medscanlagos Radiology, Cabo Frio, Brazil (A.S.); Centre for Data Analytics, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia (S.E.S.); Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany (I.B.); and Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (G.K.).
Background Deep learning (DL) methods can improve accelerated MRI but require validation against an independent reference standard to ensure robustness and accuracy. Purpose To validate the diagnostic performance of twofold-simultaneous-multislice (SMSx2) twofold-parallel-imaging (PIx2)-accelerated DL superresolution MRI in the knee against conventional SMSx2-PIx2-accelerated MRI using arthroscopy as the reference standard. Materials and Methods Adults with painful knee conditions were prospectively enrolled from December 2021 to October 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReasons Why Patients Do Not Return to Sport Post ACLReconstruction: A Cross-Sectional Study.
J Multidiscip Healthc
January 2025
School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.
Background: Patients who incur an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and undergo ACL reconstruction (ACLR) have the intention of returning to sports at their pre-injury level; however, many do not return to the pre-injury level. This study aims to investigate the common factors that hinder patients from resuming sports activities following ACLR and to assess how these barriers impact their ability to return to sports. We hypothesized that patients' psychological factors, including fear of reinjury, would significantly influence their decision to return to sport after ACL reconstruction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychological Responses Among Individuals Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.
J Sport Rehabil
January 2025
Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan.
This study elucidated how previous surgery experience, coping, and optimism influenced the mood of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. Additionally, it examined the relationships among age, preoperative mood, and postoperative mood. Sixty-four patients (n = 42 men, n = 22 women; age range = 18-51 y) who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery at one hospital in western Japan completed questionnaires before and after surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPatients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction frequently present asymmetries in the sagittal plane dynamics when performing single leg jumps but their assessment is inaccessible to health-care professionals as it requires a complex and expensive system. With the development of deep learning methods for human pose detection, kinematics can be quantified based on a video and this study aimed to investigate whether a relatively simple 2D multibody model could predict relevant dynamic biomarkers based on the kinematics using inverse dynamics. Six participants performed ten vertical and forward single leg hops while the kinematics and the ground reaction force "GRF" were captured using an optoelectronic system coupled with a force platform.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMany options are available concerning the graft fixation in ACL reconstruction, one of them being a suspensory device. Our study aimed to compare the strength of two different devices of fixation (suspensory device vs screw) on the tibia. We enrolled 80 patients older than 18 years with an isolated ACL tear confirmed at the MRI, divided into two comparative groups for a prospective study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!