Background: Testicular magnetic resonance imaging parameters, including apparent diffusion coefficient, fractional anisotropy, magnetization transfer ratio, and normalized metabolite concentrations represent useful noninvasive fingerprints of nonobstructive azoospermia. Nonobstructive azoospermia etiology might correlate with the spermatogenesis status.
Objectives: To assess the possible association between apparent diffusion coefficient, fractional anisotropy, magnetization transfer ratio, and normalised metabolite concentrations with nonobstructive azoospermia etiology.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective study included 48 consecutive men with nonobstructive azoospermia and 18 age-matched controls. All participants underwent scrotal magnetic resonance imaging. The testicular apparent diffusion coefficient, fractional anisotropy, magnetization transfer ratio, and normalized metabolite concentrations were calculated. nonobstructive azoospermia men were classified into three groups, based on etiology: group 1, idiopathic; group 2, genetic causes; and group 3, non-genetic causes. Parametric and nonparametric statistical tests were used to evaluate differences in magnetic resonance imaging parameters between nonobstructive azoospermia groups and normal testes (group 4). Regression analysis was performed to assess the most predictive magnetic resonance imaging factor of nonobstructive azoospermia etiology.
Results: Differences in mean apparent diffusion coefficient (p < .001), fractional anisotropy (p < .001), magnetization transfer ratio (p < .001), and normalized concentrations of total choline (p = .005), glucose (p = .012), myo-inositol (p = .024), and lipids (p = .010) were observed among groups. Regression analysis failed to identify the most discriminating magnetic resonance imaging feature for nonobstructive azoospermia etiology.
Discussion And Conclusion: Apparent diffusion coefficient, fractional anisotropy, magnetization transfer ratio, and normalized concentrations of total choline, glucose, myo-inositol, and lipids are helpful in discriminating nonobstructive azoospermia etiology. Magnetic resonance imaging may provide useful, noninvasive information on the microstructural and biochemical milieu of nonobstructive azoospermia testes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.13101 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Novel biallelic MCMDC2 variants were associated with meiotic arrest and nonobstructive azoospermia.
Asian J Androl
January 2025
Department of Andrology, The Center for Men's Health, Urologic Medical Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200000, China.
Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), one of the most severe types of male infertility, etiology often remains unclear in most cases. Therefore, this study aimed to detect four biallelic detrimental variants (0.5%) in the minichromosome maintenance domain containing 2 (MCMDC2) genes in 768 NOA patients by whole-exome sequencing (WES).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiminished DNA binding affinity of DMRT1 caused by heterozygous DM domain mutations is a cause of male infertility.
Hum Mol Genet
January 2025
Genom Ltd., Ilica 190, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
The most severe form of male infertility is idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), a complete sperm absence in the ejaculate. We performed exome sequencing in the Croatian infertile brothers with NOA and found a variant in DMRT1 (Doublesex and mab-3 related transcription factor 1) gene that was further assessed by the EMSA assay and molecular dynamic simulations. We additionally screened for DMRT1 mutations in 1940 infertile men diagnosed with spermatogenic failure, 644 normozoospermic controls, and 105 females with primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) recruited to the GEnetics of Male INfertility Initiative (GEMINI) or Estonian Andrology (ESTAND) cohorts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPredictive Value of Varicocele Grade and Histopathology in Simultaneous Varicocelectomy and Sperm Retrieval in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Medicina (Kaunas)
December 2024
Laboratory of Spermatology, Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Varicocele repair in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) remains a subject of debate due to inconsistent outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of microsurgical varicocelectomy on sperm recovery rates in men with NOA and to assess the role of varicocele grade and testicular histopathology in predicting postoperative outcomes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 78 men diagnosed with NOA and clinical varicocele who underwent microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with simultaneous diagnostic and therapeutic testicular biopsy at the Department of Urology of the University of Ioannina between September 2013 and December 2021.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPredictors of Successful Testicular Sperm Extraction: A New Era for Men with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia.
Biomedicines
November 2024
Laboratory of Spermatology, Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
: Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a severe form of male infertility characterized by the absence of sperm in the ejaculate due to impaired spermatogenesis. Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection is the primary treatment, but success rates are unpredictable, causing significant emotional and financial burdens. Traditional clinical and hormonal predictors have shown inconsistent reliability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAI predictive models and advancements in microdissection testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic scoping review.
Hum Reprod Open
November 2024
Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Study Question: How accurately can artificial intelligence (AI) models predict sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients undergoing micro-testicular sperm extraction (m-TESE) surgery?
Summary Answer: AI predictive models hold significant promise in predicting successful sperm retrieval in NOA patients undergoing m-TESE, although limitations regarding variability of study designs, small sample sizes, and a lack of validation studies restrict the overall generalizability of studies in this area.
What Is Known Already: Previous studies have explored various predictors of successful sperm retrieval in m-TESE, including clinical and hormonal factors. However, no consistent predictive model has yet been established.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!