A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Results of a novel surgical technique for iridodialysis repair using an iris retractor segment. | LitMetric

Purpose: To describe a novel surgical technique for iridodialysis repair using an iris retractor segment and report its clinical results.

Methods: Fifty-three eyes of 53 patients who underwent iridodialysis repair using an iris retractor segment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Data recorded from patient files consisted of age, sex, degree of iridodialysis, surgical techniques, number of segments used, preoperative and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), complications, and follow-up time.

Results: Mean follow-up time was 34.4 months. The subjects included 29 men (54.7%) and 26 women (45.3%), and the mean age was 56.6 ± 14.0 years. According to the degree of iridodialysis, the patients were divided into Group 1 (60°-89°, n = 19) and Group 2 (90°-270°, n = 34). During the iridodialysis repair for Group 1, a single segment was sufficient; however, in Group 2, one segment was used in 18 eyes (52.9%), two segments in 15 eyes (44.1%), and three segments in one eye (2.9%). The pre- and postoperative last control CDVA value in Group 2 was significantly lower than in Group 1. The pre- and postoperative IOPs for Group 2 were significantly higher than Group 1.

Conclusion: Iridodialysis repair using an iris retractor segment is a minimally invasive technique and found to be safe and effective. It will be a good option for patients with large iridodialysis, as it avoids excessive surgical manipulations and prolonged surgical time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02016-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iridodialysis repair
20
repair iris
16
iris retractor
16
retractor segment
16
novel surgical
8
surgical technique
8
iridodialysis
8
technique iridodialysis
8
degree iridodialysis
8
group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!