Deconstructing moral character judgments.

Curr Opin Psychol

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA. Electronic address:

Published: February 2022

People often make judgments of others' moral character - an inferred moral essence that presumably predicts moral behavior. We first define moral character and explore why people make character judgments before outlining three key elements that drive character judgments: behavior (good vs. bad, norm violations, and deliberation), mind (intentions, explanations, capacities), and identity (appearance, social groups, and warmth). We also provide taxonomy of moral character that goes beyond simply good vs. evil. Drawing from the theory of dyadic morality, we outline a two-dimensional triangular space of character judgments (valence and strength/agency), with three key corners - heroes, villains, and victims. Varieties of perceived moral character include saints and demons, strivers/sinners and opportunists, the nonmoral, virtuous, and culpable victims, and pure victims.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

moral character
20
character judgments
16
character
8
three key
8
moral
6
judgments
5
deconstructing moral
4
judgments people
4
people judgments
4
judgments others'
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: A virtues-based model of character development for training future physicians may lead to increased flourishing in medical students through the influence of exemplary role models. This study aimed to analyze the association between caring virtues and measures of flourishing and to identify facilitators of physician flourishing.

Methods: The authors used data from a 2011 nationally representative sample of 605 US medical students in which caring virtues (mindfulness, empathic compassion, and generosity) were measured using scales at two time points during the students' clinical years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This paper argues that practical wisdom represents a useful framework for understanding the synthesis of the scientific, technical, and moral dimensions of medical practice and may, therefore, guide the meaningful integration of concepts of competence and character into the education and support of both the technical and moral agency of medical professionals. The authors show the importance of practical wisdom in three distinct domains: (1) in effective deliberation in clinical judgments; (2) in helping clinicians flourish by making wise decisions in light of the moral and emotional challenges they face in their practice; and (3) in helping physicians navigate between the rights of patients, the physician's own moral good, and the objective good intrinsic to medicine. To promote the physician's own moral good and the objective good intrinsic to medicine, the authors propose a philosophical position, the agential view, that preserves an essentialist view of medicine but emphasizes the necessity to develop a personal moral philosophy of clinical practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Healthcare professionals may frequently violate organizational policies to deal with ethical dilemmas challenging quality of patient care. However, healthcare professionals need strong moral foundation to justify such violation of organizational policies. This study emphasized on morality as one of the social factors nurturing individual characters embodying prosocial violation as explained by 'Belief in Self-Determinism (BSD) Theory.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this second article of the Bioethics and Education Project we carry out the bioethical analysis of the results of the questionnaire answered by university students in the first years of Health Sciences. The great majority of the participants recognize the existence of equal dignity for all people, valuing their intrinsic character and, therefore, opposing discrimination of any kind. They also value positively the feeling of being cared for and well attended to in the case that they personally find themselves in situations of disability and dependency.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This article presents the development and validation of the Short Phronesis Measure (SPM), a novel tool to assess Aristotelian phronesis (practical wisdom). Across three studies, using large, nationally representative samples from the UK and US (demographically matched to census data), we employed a systematic and rigorous methodology to examine the structure, reliability, and validity of the SPM. In Study 1a, exploratory factor analysis identified ten distinct, internally reliable components of phronesis, challenging the traditional four-component Aristotelian model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!