Protective Dressings, Injury, and Device Failure in Preterm Infants Receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Adv Skin Wound Care

At the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Parvane Rezaei, MS, is a nursing student, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery; Soheila Jafari-Mianaei, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric and Neonatal Nursing; Alireza Sadeghnia, MD, is Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics; and Zahra Heidari, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology. Acknowledgments: The authors thank the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, the staff of the neonatal ICU wards of Shahid Beheshti and Al-Zahra Hospitals of Isfahan, and the tiny infants who participated in this study. This study originated from a master's thesis supported financially with a grant from the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. The authors have disclosed no other financial relationships related to this article. Submitted September 22, 2020; accepted in revised form November 5, 2020.

Published: September 2021

Objective: To investigate the protective effect of a hydrocolloid nasal dressing on the incidence and severity of nasal injury and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) failure in preterm infants receiving nasal CPAP (N-CPAP).

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted over 4 months in 2019 at level 3 neonatal ICUs in two hospitals affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Eighty eligible infants were born at 32 weeks of gestation or younger and/or with a birth weight of 1,500 g or less and had received between 4 and 72 hours of CPAP. Infants were randomly assigned to two groups; the intervention group used a protective dressing, and the control group received routine care. Data collection tools included a demographic questionnaire and nasal injury assessment score chart.

Main Outcome Measures: The incidence and severity of nasal injury in preterm infants undergoing N-CPAP.

Results: Infants in the intervention group had a significantly lower incidence and severity of nasal injury compared with the control group: 15 of 40 (37.5%) versus 37 of 40 (92.5%; P < .001). Overall, the injuries identified in this study were mostly mild and moderate, with only three severe injuries in the intervention group and five in the control group. No significant differences were detected in CPAP failure (P > .05).

Conclusions: The studied nasal barrier dressing is a safe and convenient solution to reduce nasal injury in preterm infants receiving N-CPAP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000767344.37591.b6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nasal injury
20
preterm infants
16
infants receiving
12
incidence severity
12
severity nasal
12
intervention group
12
control group
12
nasal
9
failure preterm
8
receiving nasal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!