A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Differentiation Between Chaenomelis Fructus and its Common Adulterant, Guangpi Mugua. | LitMetric

Differentiation Between Chaenomelis Fructus and its Common Adulterant, Guangpi Mugua.

J AOAC Int

Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Innovative Material Medical Research Institute, TCM and Ethnomedicine Innovation & Development International Laboratory, Changsha 410208, China.

Published: December 2021

Background: The dried fruit of Chaenomeles speciosa, known as Chaenomelis Fructus or Zhoupi Mugua, is a type of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) that is widely used to treat many diseases. Guangpi Mugua, the dried fruit of the Chaenomeles sinensis, is its most commonly known adulterant.

Objective: To establish a robust approach for the quality control and identification of Chaenomelis Fructus.

Method: Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was optimized and used to discriminate Chaenomelis Fructus from Guangpi Mugua. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) combined with fingerprint analysis and partial least-squares (PLS) discrimination analysis (DA) was employed to study the chemical differences between Chaenomelis Fructus and Guangpi Mugua. The single standard to determine multi-components (SSDMC) method, with credible precision, repeatability, stability, and durability, was developed for quantitative analysis of the abundant markers.

Results: The developed TLC and HPLC methods were effective in the authentication of Chaenomelis Fructus. Moreover, oleanolic acid, ursolic acid, pomolic acid, corosolic acid, 3-O-acetylpomolic acid, and one unknown compound were identified to be critical markers for the discrimination of Chaenomelis Fructus from Guangpi Mugua.

Conclusion: Adulteration has always been a challenge in the development of TCM. This study presents useful insights that may help solve the problem of adulteration during the preparation of Chaenomelis Fructus.

Highlights: The present study provides a systematic method for the quality control of Chaenomelis Fructus. This is therefore the first step towards solving the problem of adulteration to improve the clinical safety and effectiveness of Chaenomelis Fructus.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsab107DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chaenomelis fructus
32
guangpi mugua
16
fructus guangpi
12
chaenomelis
9
fructus
8
dried fruit
8
fruit chaenomeles
8
quality control
8
problem adulteration
8
guangpi
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!