AI Article Synopsis

  • Saliva testing for SARS-CoV-2 is a promising alternative to traditional nasopharyngeal swabs, allowing for self-collection and reducing the risk of exposure to the virus.
  • Current saliva tests are hindered by high costs due to the need for specialized tubes, prompting the development of a method using TRIzol to stabilize RNA and inactivate the virus.
  • The new TRIzol saliva testing method has been shown to be just as effective as traditional swabs, offers greater accessibility, is less expensive, and is particularly beneficial for low-income countries in managing COVID-19 cases.

Article Abstract

The use of saliva for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 has shown to be a good alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS), since it permits self-collection, avoids the exposure of healthy persons to infected patients, reduces waiting times, eliminates the need of personal protective equipment and is non-invasive. Yet current saliva testing is still expensive due to the need of specialized tubes containing buffers to stabilize the RNA of SARS-CoV-2 and inactivate the virus. These tubes are expensive and not always accessible in sufficient quantities. We now developed an alternative saliva testing method, using TRIzol for extraction, viral inactivation, and storage of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, combined with RT-qPCR, which was comparable in its performance to NPS. Paired saliva samples and NPS were taken from 15 asymptomatic healthcare workers and one patient with SARS-CoV-2. Further 13 patients with SARS-CoV-2 were only saliva-tested. All the tests were performed according to CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel. Saliva (4 mL) was taken in sterile 50 mL tubes, 1.5 mL TRIzol were added and mixed. Our results show that 5 μL of saliva RNA extracted with TRIzol allow for an adequate detection of the virus in patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 and was equally sensitive to NPS in TRIzol. We conclude that saliva testing using TRIzol is a recommendable method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 since it has several advantages over currently used saliva tests: it can be done with normal sterile tubes, does not need cold-chain handling, is stable at room temperature, is non-invasive and less costly, making it more accessible for low-income countries. Cheaper saliva testing using TRIzol is especially relevant for low-income countries to optimize diagnosis and help define quarantine durations for families, healthcare workers, schools, and other public workplaces, thus decreasing infections and mortality caused by SARS-CoV-2.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372963PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0255807PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

saliva testing
16
diagnosis sars-cov-2
12
saliva
10
sars-cov-2
9
alternative saliva
8
healthcare workers
8
sterile tubes
8
testing trizol
8
low-income countries
8
trizol
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!